That cost is still cheaper then, then legal fees, so I dont see why someone is attempting this.
Invalid Patents
Collapse
X
-
-
The problem is, both ICD and AKA may very well have tried this. With the relative costs being what they are, I can't imagine why they wouldn't have. With the gag orders, though, we'll never know.
That said, I'd still contribute to a third-party effort to get one started.Comment
-
-
I think Have Blue found some prior art i seen it on Docs web site http://www.network54.com/Hide/Forum/...eid=1078263185Living on Earth is expensive, but it does include a free trip
around the sun every year.Comment
-
Well, if that is true, are you not currently a third party?Originally posted by AGD
You can't request a re-exaimination if your in court over the patent. Has to be a third party.
Hey Hitech your starting to sound like me! - AGD
Hitech is the man.... :eek: - Blennidae
The only Hitech LubricantComment
-
IMO, it would be better if a non-profit group developed, independent from any manufacturer... receiving donations from paintball players/companies to be used to pay for the fees.Originally posted by RoadDawg
You know what would sound good. AGD the company that brought down the SP Patent. Kinda gives me butterflies in the stomach.
Anyways. It'd be nice to see a 3rd party try this and see how it turns out.

Comment
-

Hey Hitech your starting to sound like me! - AGD
Hitech is the man.... :eek: - Blennidae
The only Hitech LubricantComment
-
More info on Third Party appeals and changes in Patent regulations:
Comment
-
Tom,Originally posted by AGD
You can't request a re-exaimination if your in court over the patent. Has to be a third party. Most of the third parties don't think they will get sued.....
AGD
You haven't been sued yet have you? Especially now that you are dropping Electros from the line, why would they sue you?Comment
-
Where did the $11,000 fee that has been tossed around come from? Is there a fee for re-examination? If so, how much is it?
-CalvinComment


--

Comment