I was at www.airgun.com and i noticed how badly it needed to be updated in my opion. I recently was inquiering about an automag RT pro and it didnt have the information about the intelliframes on um. the other thing i could see as helpful is putting pictures of every type of stock gun they make like each color and p/f and centerfeed. I think this would be very helpful i hope someone who is in charge of the website can find this usefull and can make the changes as they see fit. Thanx again.
Updating Airgun.com
Collapse
X
-
Updating Airgun.com
Click For a Free IPOD!!! IT Really Works!!!
Graphite Fly A4
14" Freak/Black Uni-Mount
68cu/4500psi Crossfire
Egg2 with Z Board
Email: [email protected]Tags: None -
Snooky,
Airgun.com was originally designed in such a way that it makes it really hard to change things. Each page with the menu for instance is a separate graphic. Change one and you have to go change them all. AO is our spot for breaking news and info. We will redo airgun.com early next year.
Sorry,
AGDsigpic -
Tom,
im a web designer/network engineer and would love to redo your web site in a framework that you could easily update it when ever you want.
this would help by me being able to upgrade your site and have it done before the time that you would even be able to start it.
and would make it easier for you to maintain it.
correct me if im wrong but I think you host both this site and the airgun.com site at your offices. so you have the freedom to design the site however you want. and what ever backend you want to use.
and I think it goes without saying that you wouldn't have to pay me in cash, just product and support.
please let me know, this is a project that I would love to dive into.
it's the kind of stuff I "get my rocks off on".
reply here or e-mail me at mailto:[email protected]
from the judge in the WDP v Sp case.... " i find it significant that aside from a somewhat limited notebook produced by gaston, the four named inventors offer NO documentation of there work or there contributions to the conception or reduction to practice of the claimed invention"Comment
-
up for tom
from the judge in the WDP v Sp case.... " i find it significant that aside from a somewhat limited notebook produced by gaston, the four named inventors offer NO documentation of there work or there contributions to the conception or reduction to practice of the claimed invention"Comment
-
hmmm..last time someone tried to do that shartley gave him a lecture about some rule about something..ssooo..i don't reccomend it
Comment
-
xmetal2001
You are correct.
I am glad that you remembered though. 
datapimp69
What xmetal2001 was referring to is that soliciting for work is not the purpose of AO... even if only done in a "helpful" or genuinely "concerned" manner. It just opens up way too many cans of worms. I am sure you understand.
Of course there ARE the classic methods of contact and solicitation, and I always recommend them.. but they don't involve pitches in a public forum.
I think I will leave it at that... (mark it on your calendar... LOL)
Here is a good one that covers that issue...
Comment
-
well I had on idea,
I wont do it again. was just trying to help. now I know
datapimp69 <---- shoots himself in the foot for being bad
from the judge in the WDP v Sp case.... " i find it significant that aside from a somewhat limited notebook produced by gaston, the four named inventors offer NO documentation of there work or there contributions to the conception or reduction to practice of the claimed invention"Comment
-
-
LOL No harm done... well none but to your foot (depending on your choice of footwear).
Oh..... MERRY CHRISTMAS everyone, and a HAPPY HOLIDAY SEASON... whichever holidays you may celebrate.
Comment


Comment