yeeehhh...
intimidators look disgusting
Collapse
X
-
If you wear glasses or contacts doesn't mean you see things differently.Originally posted by viperx1_1000Do you wear glasses or have contacts?
just a question.
I think timmies are sexy. It's all about your opinion.
Mag Owner #2
Green / Black RT Pro:
1. Evil Pipe Barrel 12" Green Tip | 2. Blade Trigger/Intelliframe
3. X-Valve | 4. 32* Green Gel Grips
5. Level 10 | 6. ULT (5 ULT Shims 1 Lvl 10 Shim)
7. ULE Verticle Green Body | 8. Ricochet Apache
9. Centerflag 68/4500 HPA Tank | 10. Dye 68ci HP Tank Cover
11. Green Shocktech Stumpy Dropforward | 12. Shocktech on/off ASA
13. Rogue Rail | 14. VA w/ Green CP Foregrip
Comment
-
-
As far as the Intimidator manual is concerned, it's a Spyder that uses a RAM instead of a hammer/spring. The bolt operation is basically the same, as well as using the same double-stack design with the bolt linkage to the valve striker. The valve still operates roughly the same way. Velocity control is in theory the same on both -- a combination of how long you slam the valve open, and whatever your regulator is feeding you.The Intimidator marker is a solenoid controlled open-bolt design, very similar to the popular open-bolt blowback design found in the Spyder. The primary difference is that instead of a blowback re-cocking on a spring-loaded striker, the bolt is locked into a dual pressurized machined slider. The back of the chamber is pessurized to move the bolt forward, and the front is pressurized to move the bolt backward. This allows for very low cycling pressure as well as much less cocking recoil. An electronic 4-way valve controls this slider.
So let's round them all up... same bolt action, same valve action, roughly same form factor (if not slightly larger than a Spyder), roughly the same weight (if not slightly heavier than a Spyder). Different force pushing the bolt/striker. Oh, and probably lower operating pressure. Because, you know, it makes the balls fly further and more accurately.
That's it. If I say an EMag is a fancy Mag, are you guys going to get all worked up as well? Even better, if I say a hAIR trigger'd mag is just a fancy mag, are you going to get worked up? Just looking at the parts list and diagrams, how could you possibly MISS all the similarities?
Hell, the same marketing philosophy seems to drive both guns, which is part of the point of this thread. Spyders pretty much all just sport different gee-whiz aesthetic changes. Intimidators... gee, same thing, only even more gaudy. Can you say 'gaudy'? Evidently, a lot of people can't. They might as well make a Trogdor edition Intimidator. With a big beefy arm coming out the back of his neck there."Accuracy by aiming."
Definitely not on the A-Team.
Comment
-
yeah im def not a fan of timmysTEAM DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE
dye matrix
warped superman angel lcd
"tell the dead box i sent u...u'll get a group discount"
http://www.automags.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=125256 my feedback
Comment
-
Yeah, guess what? An imp is the exact same as a spyder, except it have a pnuematic operated hammer instead of a spring driven one. Guess what? Angels are spyders that use puematic driven hammers instead of a spring and blowback gas recocking it. As far as I know, so is a macdev cyborg. Oh yeah, a cocker is just a closed bolt spyder that uses pnuematics. You can compare any stacked tube gun to a spyder, its not very hard.
Comment
-
My experience with Intimidators has left a negative taste for them; however, I know many people who love them to death.
While this post is very, very stupid and pointless, I must agree. Timmies are pretty damned ugly. Especially the species and dragon timmies. My gawd.
But then again, I've had people tell me that 'mags are ugly. I like the look of mags. It's preference, really. Anyone who tells you differently has an agenda.
Comment
-
I've hated all stacked tube guns for years, I classify them all as "brick guns", so timmies are defintely on my hate list. The fancy milling or designs on these kind of guns, to me at least, just make it more obvious that the friggin' gun is a brick in the first place and look totally out of place.
This is purly aethetics, and I have complete respect for the performance of many of these "bricks" on the field, timmies and vikings are definetly included, and have been lit up at various times by some of them
I've just always loved single stacked guns
Comment
-
You sir, you are correct. That is exactly how I see those all those guns in my mind. I look at the valve/bolt, then look at the form factor.Originally posted by tony3Yeah, guess what? An imp is the exact same as a spyder, except it have a pnuematic operated hammer instead of a spring driven one. Guess what? Angels are spyders that use puematic driven hammers instead of a spring and blowback gas recocking it. As far as I know, so is a macdev cyborg. Oh yeah, a cocker is just a closed bolt spyder that uses pnuematics. You can compare any stacked tube gun to a spyder, its not very hard.
And then I look at my mag, and I'm happy once again.
"Accuracy by aiming."
Definitely not on the A-Team.
Comment
-
so in this mindset a shocker is just a mag with a body over the valve.
and the bodies from deadly wind will turn a mag into a shocker, becuase body is covering the valve.
am i right or are you going to be mad at me.
all i am saying is that diferent strokes for different folks.
I am a declared Carb lover.
Member and president of the Anti-Atkins Group.
Advocate for the promotion of Rice, the truest sticky icky.
Comment
-
its preference, i like how timmy's look but i dont like how they feel when i hold/shoot them. i'm more of a spool valve fan.[*img]http://www.browndotdesign.com/Xodus/AO/YeahThatsMe.jpg[/img]
Image too large- Tato
Comment
-
agreed, whatever my quibles about the looks of timmies, the DM4 is by far the ugliest, goofiest looking gun I've ever seen with a price tag that high.
With the DM4, its like the designers thought to themselves, "well, we've got the performance we wanted, but it's appearance just needs a generous touch of gay".
Comment





Comment