An idea to get around SP Patents...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jack_Dubious
    ubi dubium ibi libertas
    • Apr 2002
    • 922

    #1

    An idea to get around SP Patents...

    Sorry if this idea has been talked about before.....but...

    couldnt a company sell thier electronic gun in pieces? Break the gun down into easily assembled components and sell the components separately. Would this bypass the patent laws?

    say for example some enterprising guy opens 3 separate companies. one company makes a solenoid/ram/body housing, another company makes a switch/trigger frame, and the last company produces a circuit board. The end user just buys these 3 components and then assembles them into a gun. Would this work?


    JDub

    "Automags.org. You'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."
  • hitech
    Not a shedder of vortices
    • Nov 2001
    • 4775

    #2
    Originally posted by Jack_Dubious
    Couldn't a company sell thier electronic gun in pieces? ...Would this bypass the patent laws?
    As far as I know that is specifically against the patent laws. Think about it, if it were that easy, everyone would do that to avoid the patent laws.


    Hey Hitech your starting to sound like me! - AGD
    Hitech is the man.... :eek: - Blennidae
    The only Hitech Lubricant

    Comment

    • Blazestorm
      I win
      • Feb 2002
      • 3523

      #3
      That actually sounds pretty good... They don't sell an electronic marker, they sell parts for them, they just happen to assemble into one that a person can purchase...

      I don't see how this would be by-passing the patent
      My Feedback
      UBLPB. UBLPB. UBLPB.

      Comment

      • spantol
        Turgid Member
        • Sep 2002
        • 1024

        #4
        That would be Contributory Patent Infringement:

        Contributory infringement occurs whenever someone "offers to sell or sells ... a component of a patented machine, manufacture, combination or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use." 35 U.S.C. S 271(c).

        Loaded 2004 BKO For Sale

        Comment

        • Jack_Dubious
          ubi dubium ibi libertas
          • Apr 2002
          • 922

          #5
          Originally posted by spantol
          That would be Contributory Patent Infringement:
          ah I knew someone would know Patent law. thanks spantol.

          JDub

          "Automags.org. You'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."

          Comment

          Working...