Wait how legal is this:Rocking trigger?

[Lurker27]

Ineffective? I can fan like 12 bps, and with a light trigger, it doesn't require the telltale loss of inaccuracy. A legal, autoresponce, accurate 24bps seems practical to me.

[DK1]

Ineffective? I can fan like 12 bps, and with a light trigger, it doesn't require the telltale loss of inaccuracy. A legal, autoresponce, accurate 24bps seems practical to me.

Point taken, I misunderstood what you were saying at first. You're right. I didn't see that method coming.

Banned. :)

DK1

[ramenjames]

well the nppl says that a tigger requirs that there is one shot for every pull and release of teh trigger (something to that extent)

well on a normal trigger the pull is your finger and the spring/magnets release the force

on this trigger the pull is your finger and your other finger is the relese (as well as the force)

so useing the abouve logic ....i would say its legal

[MidnightRider]

The trigger starts at rest, straight up and down. When you pull the Bottom Half back past the vertical plane it fires and then resets to the vertical plane again, straight up and down. One shot. On cycle. Now it is time for the Top Half to go through its cycle of breaking the vertical plane by moving back and then reseting back to the vertical plane. IF there was no end to the cycle, aka the the trigger is vertical, then this marker should be technically always fireing.

We are always trying to eliminate the slack in the rear-ward travel of our triggers. Sombody just decided to intentionally put forward slack in their trigger.


Peace

MR



p.s.
I am not commenting on if this is legal or not. Just making an observation on the mechanics of the the trigger.

[Lurker27]

A release of force is never actually necessary. You can jstu use escalating force with each step in walking, since a pull automatically resets the prior pull.

Guys, this is so obviously illegal.

[skife]

Heres an animated pic of something similar.

looks legal to me, only one switch correct?