Micro Spyder

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • XbeasleyX
    Best Of The Not So Good
    • Apr 2004
    • 233

    #1

    Micro Spyder

    Well I had a great idea where most great ideas are hatched (while sitting on the john). Well anyway I noticed that spyders have a ton of extra length that is not needed, all you'd need to do is redrill the feedcup hole, reposition the valve, measure measure measure and cut the bolt to fit the new feed and valve placement and then make a new hole in the hammer to compensate for the new bolt/valve position. Well and cut the body but I figured it was assumed. Any ideas/imput?
    I wish I was a zombie, but I'd be a smart zombie like Jesus.
  • NewbieMagMan10988
    AO > Everything
    • Jul 2004
    • 580

    #2
    yes...

    I had a simalar plan to shorten the bolt travel distance on a spyder, in turn making the whole thing shorter, and it should work, but im not going to cut the crap out of a perfectly fine spyder just to try. As long as your main spring was a litle stiffer so compinsate(sp?) for the shoter body, and made sure the hammer wouldnt smack into the valve because it was still tring to go the "old" distance. IM sure if you messed with it it could be done. Good luck!

    Comment

    • personman

      #3
      Wont work. If you make the hammer tube shorter, then the bolt wont travel the distance that it needs to in order to load a ball and fire it without horrible blowback..

      Comment

      • Glickman
        *Insert Witty Phrase*
        • Sep 2003
        • 2673

        #4
        seen something like that on a spyder pistol conversion, just not into so much depth. and the lpr was rethreaded for 12 gram holder, pretty cool stuff

        Comment

        • eric1337
          Registered User
          • Sep 2004
          • 18

          #5
          u would need a very stiff spring or maybe you could use magnets like the 03 shocker u could prolly make a half block spyder easily tho

          Comment

          • TheTramp
            Registered User
            • Jan 2001
            • 4019

            #6
            A Spyder already has a pretty hefty kick. If you use a stronger spring it'll take a correspondingly higher pressure to blow the hammer back. WAY more kick.
            "Relax. Don't worry. Have a Home Brew."
            -Charlie Papazian

            Feedback: http://www.automags.org/forums/showt...threadid=40134

            Comment

            • Maggot6
              Registered User
              • Aug 2004
              • 1527

              #7
              Well, computers in the 1960's were huge, and could add and subtact. They put them through several differnt stages, no a calculator for 1.00$ does the same thing. SO if you take a spyder, and make everything smaller through some sort of fraction 2:1 etc, I don't see why it wouldn't.. And for the tighetr spring recoil, yeah use magnets...Ithink it could be done.

              Comment

              • TheTramp
                Registered User
                • Jan 2001
                • 4019

                #8
                Originally posted by Maggot6
                Well, computers in the 1960's were huge, and could add and subtact. They put them through several differnt stages, no a calculator for 1.00$ does the same thing. SO if you take a spyder, and make everything smaller through some sort of fraction 2:1 etc, I don't see why it wouldn't.. And for the tighetr spring recoil, yeah use magnets...Ithink it could be done.

                1) comparing a computer system to a pneumatic device is not a productive line of thought.

                2) There is no way you're going to come up with magnets that will produce the force nessasary to open a Spyder's valve. Iven if you did, you'd still need just as strong a blowback force to re-cock. Perhaps some sort of electro magnet that could be shut off during re-cock but now you've got to deal with size and power supply.
                "Relax. Don't worry. Have a Home Brew."
                -Charlie Papazian

                Feedback: http://www.automags.org/forums/showt...threadid=40134

                Comment

                • Pyroboy597
                  We need more room for titl
                  • May 2004
                  • 518

                  #9
                  yea not a good comparison.. that is like saying "if i reduce the size of my mag's body by 50%, the paintball should still fit through thw hole right?"
                  IM SORRY AO FOR DISOBEYING YOUR SIG RULES!!!! FORGIVE ME!!!

                  Comment

                  • Aleis
                    Registered User
                    • Feb 2004
                    • 116

                    #10
                    i don't see why you could do it with a lower strength spring by adding in a Regulator, making hte gun low preasure. The spring has to be so stiff so it can over comethe force of a full preasure CO2 behind the cupseal. Lower the input preasure, soften the spring and lighten the hammer. doesn't do anything for physical size but opens up other venues to gettting there
                    Guns
                    Tippman SL-68 II (First gun and still lovin it)
                    X-Mag XT00160 (Shiny and Blue)
                    Custom 'AlphaMag' Mag (X-Valve, Chromed Y-grip, Chromed Galatix Z-body, Gloss Black Rogue Rail)

                    Comment

                    • Target Practice
                      irc.zirc.org:6667 = chat!
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 3180

                      #11
                      Holy thread ressurection, Batman! Moron.


                      "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." --Henry Louis Mencken.

                      Comment

                      • HarrysSon
                        Harrison!!!
                        • Mar 2005
                        • 155

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Maggot6
                        Well, computers in the 1960's were huge, and could add and subtact. They put them through several differnt stages, no a calculator for 1.00$ does the same thing. SO if you take a spyder, and make everything smaller through some sort of fraction 2:1 etc, I don't see why it wouldn't.. And for the tighetr spring recoil, yeah use magnets...Ithink it could be done.
                        i didnt get wat he said

                        Comment

                        • Automaggot68

                          #13
                          Originally posted by HarrysSon
                          i didnt get wat he said
                          That's because it didn't make any sense.

                          Comment

                          • johnson88
                            Registered User
                            • Jan 2005
                            • 148

                            #14
                            I think if they put something resmbling a 2k5 timmy frame it would make the gun feel smaller.

                            Comment

                            • personman

                              #15
                              I think I was right when I said if you made the spyder any smaller, the bolt wouldnt have any room to make complete cycles. You would either have alot of blowback or the ball wouldnt load all the way..

                              Comment

                              Working...