Xmag vs. Emag

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • albrigrp
    Blade
    • Sep 2004
    • 16

    #1

    Xmag vs. Emag

    Could someone tell me the differences between a Xmag and Emag???
    Could someone tell me the fire rate of both markers with stock equipment???
    Can the rate of fire be adjusted on both????
    Can a Tac One body fit on a Emag, or Xmag, without any modifications????
    Thanks RPA
    Blade
    Dead Nutts
  • Dayspring
    aka- The Day Wang

    • May 2001
    • 9664

    #2
    With the same software, both the Emag and Xmag will fire at the same speeds with the same Rate of Fire cap. (20bps)

    Xmag has removable breeches, a unified body/rail & an anti-chop eye. The entire body is aluminum.

    Emag- body & rail are seperate, body isn't always aluminum, no eye.

    Xmag is heavier.

    Tac-One body will fit on an Emag easily. Just swap bodies.

    (Basically, the gripframes are the same on the Xmag and Emag. just different bodies.)

    Comment

    • Caffiend
      Caffinated Member
      • Jul 2003
      • 672

      #3
      Originally posted by albrigrp
      Could someone tell me the differences between a Xmag and Emag???
      X has ACE, removeable breeches, and no rail. E doesn't have those, except it has a rail.

      Originally posted by albrigrp
      Could someone tell me the fire rate of both markers with stock equipment???
      Pretty sure it would depend on the software version. Both would be pretty close with same version, I think

      Originally posted by albrigrp
      Can the rate of fire be adjusted on both????
      Yes

      Originally posted by albrigrp
      Can a Tac One body fit on a Emag, or Xmag, without any modifications????
      E yes, X don't know


      Other people will be able to answer more in depth, but that should get you started.

      Edit: Dayspring types faster, maybe I shouldn't watch movies while posting...
      VOOOODOOOO!
      http://www.southwestvoodoo.com

      Comment

      • Bad_Dog
        self proclaimed warpaholic
        • Jul 2003
        • 1777

        #4
        tac one will NOT fit on an Xmag, unless you were to buy a rail too and ditch the Xmag mainbody.... (just swap the lowers)

        My Feedback

        Comment

        • wolfwood_is_here
          6' 8" Nate...
          • Sep 2004
          • 59

          #5
          Then again, either way you wouldn't want to buy an x-mag if you think you are gonna replace the body. They are soo pretty and nice...

          Plus you can get an emag + tac one body for approxiamtely/less than what you would pay for an x-mag.
          If I am wrong in my thinking, please let me know. If you think I am wrong and are too lazy to say why, don't waste anyones time by posting.
          My automags forum feedback...
          eBay feedback...


          May you go with the love and protection of Almighty God.

          Comment

          • ghideon
            Registered User
            • Aug 2002
            • 390

            #6
            One small correction. The E-Mag is heavier.

            Comment

            • emagballa560
              Got Emag? I dont...Dm4 :)
              • Aug 2004
              • 1093

              #7
              Originally posted by ghideon
              One small correction. The E-Mag is heavier.
              correct , the xmag has alot of milling done so it is lighter, STOCK , but the emag can sloe be milled out ,the rail and the frame-battery pack

              so if the emag has ule everyrthing they are bout even weight

              WARNING , Attention all Xbox owners, Power Cord defect)

              Come play me
              Gametag= jtm560

              Comment

              • albrigrp
                Blade
                • Sep 2004
                • 16

                #8
                Thanks

                Thanks for the information on both markers. I'm going to go with the Emag with a Tac One body. I do have one other question.
                What is the different software versions available 1.37?? 3.2?? what are the differences between the versions????
                This is the best web site around. I'm glad I joined. RPA
                Blade
                Dead Nutts

                Comment

                • Dayspring
                  aka- The Day Wang

                  • May 2001
                  • 9664

                  #9
                  3.2 is the most recent and so far best of the released softwares. It includes a shot-buffering feature to smooth out the shot rhythm & a trigger test mode.

                  Comment

                  Working...