Combo vertical and warp feed ULE body

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • master_alexander
    im a gun pimp :D
    • Sep 2004
    • 2462

    #16
    or you could have a body that rotates any way you want it and you can lock it in place, so it is also intigrated into a rail.you can rotate it 180* around the rail, universal for leftys no extra holes 2 detents ya get the picture i hope
    "Ah yes, I have one of the 32*rebels that I always take to big scenario games. It keeps the truck from rolling if I have to park on a hill." - automikey

    Comment

    • hitech
      Not a shedder of vortices
      • Nov 2001
      • 4775

      #17
      Originally posted by Creative Mayhem
      There was a long discussion in chat about this topic...
      Originally posted by Chronobreak
      hmm..yes had the idea too...
      Originally posted by mcdkid
      YOU FREAKIN READ MY MIND!!!! i thought of this about 1-2 years ago...
      So why hasn't someone done this?


      Hey Hitech your starting to sound like me! - AGD
      Hitech is the man.... :eek: - Blennidae
      The only Hitech Lubricant

      Comment

      • mcdkid
        Offical PB Ref
        • Mar 2003
        • 845

        #18
        Originally posted by hitech
        I only have the capacity to make ideas, not products.
        simple
        Hard work never killed anybody...but why take a chance?
        My Team=Blackhearts
        My Field/Store=Paintball Atlanta




        Comment

        • captian pinky
          Bearded Works

          • Oct 2004
          • 2755

          #19
          i know i dont have many posts but what about taping 2 holes one vert the other warp on the side then making a cap with a detent already in it and make the cap to plug the hole like one on the front of an angel so that way you get a flat top for those whoe like the new warps but still the vert and with the body they could include the warp feed nek and the direct
          but i think this would work as far as the 2 mounting holes people wont like it because of the holes on the side of there gun here are some pics to help you piece it together the detent would not be stationary but in the plug and rebuildable


          it is under angel end plugsX2 silver
          http://www.wdp-paintball.co.uk/shop03/gap.php?$f_currency=&$currency=USD

          butt wouldt have detent showing on top but still on top only on inside ule warp body
          ANSgear is the worlds largest online paintball store. Huge selection of Paintball Guns, Tanks, Masks, Loaders, Harnesses, Barrels and more. Fast & Free shipping will keep you up to date with all of the best paintball gear.


          ule body vert
          ANSgear is the worlds largest online paintball store. Huge selection of Paintball Guns, Tanks, Masks, Loaders, Harnesses, Barrels and more. Fast & Free shipping will keep you up to date with all of the best paintball gear.

          Comment

          • hitech
            Not a shedder of vortices
            • Nov 2001
            • 4775

            #20
            Originally posted by captian pinky
            i know i dont have many posts but what about taping 2 holes one vert the other warp on the side then making a cap with a detent already in it and make the cap to plug the hole like one on the front of an angel so that way you get a flat top for those whoe like the new warps but still the vert and with the body they could include the warp feed nek and the direct...
            THAT is exactly what I was suggesting...


            Hey Hitech your starting to sound like me! - AGD
            Hitech is the man.... :eek: - Blennidae
            The only Hitech Lubricant

            Comment

            • trains are bad
              Registered User
              • Oct 2003
              • 1751

              #21
              remeber the 'blocking plate' forms part of the breech on the inside, and as such has to have a curve on it. And the curve has to be oriented correctly when it's screwed in fully.
              TRB's feedback

              Comment

              • Lohman446
                Useful posts: 7
                • Jun 2003
                • 9315

                #22
                Good idea.. but isn't the detent on the top of the body for warp feed (it is ) If you had it on the right side and were using the warp wouldn't the force of the warp push the detent back and let the ball roll forward

                N/M - addressed above I'm
                Last edited by Lohman446; 01-10-2005, 10:50 AM.
                "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

                Comment

                • ScatterPlot
                  Not pop, it's all Coke
                  • Jan 2002
                  • 1960

                  #23
                  Originally posted by trains are bad
                  remeber the 'blocking plate' forms part of the breech on the inside, and as such has to have a curve on it. And the curve has to be oriented correctly when it's screwed in fully.

                  That's where you would run into one problem, and then I think there's another. I don't think you are gonna have enough space in between the two holes to make a full "bridge" of metal going between the two halves. I'm not sure cause I don't have one sitting here in front of me, but wouldn't the plug have to integrate some of the threads for the feedneck hole? I.e. wouldn't the plug and feedneck end up touching each other in some way? I'm not sure, someone with a gun handy run check . If they do, this means a great amount of difficulty to manufacture, since you must make one hole, then make a plug, then make another hole, then tap the hole and the plug, then make sure the threads still line up a second time when you screw the plug into the second hole. That would be way expensive to get right reliably every time, unless you were CNC'ing it which just adds more to the cost of tools, time, and all that stuff. IMO it would also be pretty ugly. Well OK anything can be made to look good, but thinking costwise it would be hard to make pretty.

                  I think a far simpler, cheaper, and (probably) less ugly way would be to just mill out a huge hunk around the feedtube and go with xmag-style removeable breeches. With milling that is just like a strait linear tube instead of the xmag curves it would probably be cheaper than existing breeches and would almost definately be cheaper than the plug idea.

                  I think it would be a cool thing to make, but I think it would be hard if there wasn't enough metal to bridge that gap.



                  And if there IS enough metal to make the bridge?
                  My post is moot, somebody make one already
                  AIM-bertmcmahan
                  My email:[email protected]
                  My feedback thread
                  Good traders: richie,Roguefactor,moufo48,845,brtncstm160,vf-xx

                  Mags don't shoot darts... they shoot nails.
                  I used to be bertmcmahan, that I did.

                  Comment

                  • SlartyBartFast
                    The Flying Scotsman
                    • Jun 2002
                    • 2940

                    #24
                    The answer is modules. But AGDE, who hold the patent, aren't producing bodies anymore.

                    So the reason AGD can't produce a pneumatic trigger and the reason they can't produce a single integrated body with interchangeable modules is the same. Another company holds the patent.

                    Comment

                    • Deltree
                      ph33r
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 128

                      #25
                      i dont know if anyones said it yet but why not rotating breaches? i know theyre out there. it should be simple enough to mill the rail and body to accomodate that.

                      Comment

                      Working...