Every OS has it's place. Don't forget that Microsoft is a software company, and Apple is a hardware company. Microsoft decided long ago that it would create software to run on commodity hardware, while Apple still (for the most part) controls not only the operating system, but also the hardware that it runs on. All of the UNIX/Linux administrators in my company's IT department (including me) use Macs running OS X, since they provide the best mix of UNIX-compatibility while still natively supporting enough mainstream apps to allow us to interface with the rest of the company using Windows. The point is that I would never suggest a Mac to someone unless I thought it would really be a good fit for them. Quite frankly, that's not very many people (although I love my Powerbook to death). Similarly, although I have been a Linux user since before there was even such a thing as RedHat, I would not suggest Linux to most people. As in all things, every operating system has it's place in the world, and calling one better than the other is like saying that an SUV is always better than a sports car, or vice versa. it all depends on the needs of the user.
And for my final plug, check out this updated version of Neal Stephenson's In the Beginning was the Command Line, called The Command Line in 2004. It offers great insight into the "OS Wars".
And for my final plug, check out this updated version of Neal Stephenson's In the Beginning was the Command Line, called The Command Line in 2004. It offers great insight into the "OS Wars".


Comment