Interpreting Sig rules

[RobAGD]

Wow, now the admin is resorting to name calling. Come on man, what are you... 12? Going to Tom to talk about being banned because an admin of the site is on a power trip is "whinning like a little girl" I think it's rather sad that an Admin of an online forum has degraded himself down to name calling. We're trying to approach this in a rather civil manner, please do the same for us.

Actually I am discribing how it was explained to me by someone. He got a ban for doing something he shouldnt have.

Tom turned the ban over #1 because Sam went crying to him about it #2 because Tom wanted the pages numbers served. If Sam didnt generate the crap storms he did and generate page hits his ban would have stood. Everytime a mod has tried to punish sam for going out of bounds he has called and cried to Tom about it. So from my end of things and what I get too see I would say he went cring to Tom like a little girl.

So I call it like I see it and I am some how not civil. Take a look about what people are calling me and you want to talk about being civil.

-R

[SCpoloRicker]

Sam - You were unbanned because you whinned to Tom like a little girl, and to be honest if your posts didnt generate the page views they DID, then he would have left the ban. So dont get all atwitter because your ban got over turned.

-Robert

Geez, I thought the Thorde was rude.

Psst. No one (from my area) was surprised by their ban. The point was, notable members are intentionaly pushing matters to make a point. Speaking of not replying, has anyone answered Cable's email from 2/17?

So, the point of your almost-offensive sig was to see who would notice aforementioned almost-offensive sig? That's the reason? What, are you trying to sniff out backseat moderators?

You claim that Shartley's ban wass overturned to create site traffic? Now, I'm the first to disagree with Sam (well maybe not first ) but I will in the same breath state that he voices himself well. Calling him a little girl, and implying he posts the kind of inane crap (that the mods seem determined to protect) is a bit spurius, no? Besides, is AO selling adspace all of a sudden? Gotta turn it up a notch, bring back Puc*err Shartley?

/arse not curse filter?

//arsehole

[SCpoloRicker]

So I call it like I see it and I am some how not civil. Take a look about what people are calling me and you want to talk about being civil.

-R

Non-opinion (i.e. fact) aside, most members have been fairly civil. It seems to me that you are the one operating under assumptions. We just want a spade to be called a spade.

[FallNAngel]

Has nothing to do with being an "internet badass" it has to do with the simple fact your pissed that I am not going into detail about a person I banned. I have in the pass made mistakes and corrected them. I have had user ask me to look into a ban issue and I did so.

So why do you not do it now? You say you banned a person for one reason, then when that reason is proven wrong, you fail to unban the person. How is that right?

That simple, this has been a rather intresting experment. People cant even read a simple rule and obey that rule. They feel some odd need to push around something and then get upset because they got the ban they knew would come.

Personally, I'm not defending people who push around rules and more or less ask for a ban... I just don't see the point in it. I am however defending someone who's been shown was not at fault for his ban. If you have another reason for the banning, at least say so. Otherwise you're just proving our point by completely avoiding the question time and again.

I put things in my sigs to see who reacts, I see who is going to have fits and I know thats going to happen. I also know the Rules and I am not breaking them. Thats the differnace, I KNOW the rules and stay within them. If thats cutting a fine line then so be it.

So, you put things in your sig, then when people point out that they don't agree with the material, you get angry and ignore them? What did you expect to happen? People to be peachy with it? Obviously people are going to get upset. Knowing the rules and staying within them is great. No problems with that at all. The problem is, "I offered to suck his penis" is rather subjective as to whether or not it's family oriented material. You may not think there's anything wrong, but obviously other people do. Why would you leave what is considered by at least more than one person to be non-family oriented material when you're representing a company? Is that what you want people to associate with AGD, that that's ok? I realize this may sound like I've gone off the deep end... it's not like you're quoting horrible explicit lyrics... but there are people who find it offensive. Isn't that enough?

You know oddly enought only one person has contacted me about thier ban. Intresting No ?

Very interesting. You ban people, then as far as I can tell leave no way for them to otherwise contact you. You have no e-mail address or instant messenger handle in your profile and you can't use the PM or e-mail link unless you're logged in... but they're banned, so afaik they can't log in (what would be the point of banning them if they could). Perhaps I'm missing something, but how are they supposed to contact you? Do you send them an e-mail when they're banned?

[shartley]

Sam - You were unbanned because you whinned to Tom like a little girl, and to be honest if your posts didnt generate the page views they DID, then he would have left the ban. So dont get all atwitter because your ban got over turned.

-Robert

Actually I am discribing how it was explained to me by someone. He got a ban for doing something he shouldnt have.

Tom turned the ban over #1 because Sam went crying to him about it #2 because Tom wanted the pages numbers served. If Sam didnt generate the crap storms he did and generate page hits his ban would have stood. Everytime a mod has tried to punish sam for going out of bounds he has called and cried to Tom about it. So from my end of things and what I get too see I would say he went cring to Tom like a little girl.

So I call it like I see it and I am some how not civil. Take a look about what people are calling me and you want to talk about being civil.

-R

[1stdeadeye]

I have people making some kind of dig about me having to call my mother because I am out late.

I have people saying I am power crazed, I have walked away from this job before. Its not that important to me.

Feel loved because I make fun of everybody, it is what I do.


I will ask that you try Hooked on Phonics. It might improve your spelling!

[-=Squid=-]

Ok, again, he is ignoring the question because he has no answer. RobAGD screwed up and won't admit it. He is resorting to petty name calling, and flat out making stuff up just so he doesn't have to admit that he screwed up.

So, he won't answer my simple, simple question, so I make a new thread. I get threatened with a perm ban (like it matters, AO has gone to hell thanks to retards like RobAGD) and I still don't have an answer.

I bet Rob IS the "AO Moderation Team." Hell, what's funny is that in an "AO Moderation Team" post, whoever it is admits that I am right about this whole thing! Comic brilliance.

So... I ask one more time...

Why was Automaggot banned?

[jackbauer]

"Train Wreck" is the best slogan used to describe this..........thing. i am glad that i lost intrest in the first few pages.


ps~ i hope to see you AO-CA guys at the NORCAL vs SOCAL in april.

[SCpoloRicker]

ps~ i hope to see you AO-CA guys at the NORCAL vs SOCAL in april.

Wouldn't worry about that if I were you

[hitech]

...I would say he went cring to Tom like a little girl.

So I call it like I see it and I am some how not civil. Take a look about what people are calling me and you want to talk about being civil.

I would say none of "you" are being civil...

[SpecialBlend2786]

So... I ask one more time...

Why was Automaggot banned?

quoted just cause i want an answer too.

preferably within 30 days....

[AGD]

I have turned off Sigs. Time to end this nonsense.

AGD