It has always seemed to me that the team that is in 1st after prelims, never ends up winning it all. This happened to my team 2 tournies ago, first after prelims and we end up getting 2nd. It really sucks when this happened, but I wondered if this is a trend in current paintball. I used only the nppl not psp to figure this out since the way psp is run, it really isn't a good judge.
I looked through all 2005-2003 nppl tournies and saw who was 1st after prelims and who ended up winning. I looked though 14 tournies and the result is, you don't want to be first after prelims, unless you are dynasty. Only 3 times has the 1st place team won after coming in 1st after prelims, for all those 3 times, it was dynasty everytime. 2 of those 3 times, it was at huntington beach, which dynasty has won 3 times out of the 3 years they went there. Just something I found interesting.
I looked through all 2005-2003 nppl tournies and saw who was 1st after prelims and who ended up winning. I looked though 14 tournies and the result is, you don't want to be first after prelims, unless you are dynasty. Only 3 times has the 1st place team won after coming in 1st after prelims, for all those 3 times, it was dynasty everytime. 2 of those 3 times, it was at huntington beach, which dynasty has won 3 times out of the 3 years they went there. Just something I found interesting.



Comment