AO: We are back from the dead... again! After an 18 day outage, we are finally alive and well. Who knew how complicated updating software/databases from 2008 would be. I still have alot of tweaks to make, but my main goal was getting everything patched and updated to 2026.
Vbulletin 6 has changed alot since 2008 so we will have a ton of new features to dig into.
Anywhere you see mystery reg it refers to the new Fatty Stabalizer. These are all the tests that I feel have a basis in factual results, I have some more but I think they all contained 60hz noise that appeared due to bad transducer/power supply.
The first graph has the Fatty as the light blue and the mystery reg the green. Is there a "newer" Fatty?
I happy to see that the 2-liter still shows the fastest re-charge. I was expecting to see some "tests" that "prooved" that some other reg was faster. This one shows that the Fatty is pretty good and, if the green is a newer Fatty, that it's almost as good as the 2-liter.
"Relax. Don't worry. Have a Home Brew."
-Charlie Papazian
those charts all seem to be very close. is there really that much of a different in recharge in the top regs of today? i mean besides if your shooting 30 bps, why do you need a reg that can recharge faster then that. jw.
Actually regulators make a very important difference, most notably on dump chamber markers. I took several of the low - middle end markers and through them on a shocker sft with dynasty board and set it to super fast ramping or whatever. After the 6th string you saw an average drop of 20-30fps as measured by my ballistic chronograph. With the higher end regs CP and greater you saw either no drop or a drop I could not discern from just a bad paintball or an actual psi drop.
Some interesting finds are that the sidewinder is not a top performer, it still performs well but on dump chamber markers I would not advise it. For most people if they can stand the ergonomics I would reccomend the Fatty Stabalizer sinces its SO simple to take apart, whereas the 2liter parts can be put in backwards and it contains I think roughly 3x the number of orings.
Comment