What is the fastest......?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • siloseven
    seven
    • Aug 2004
    • 278

    #16
    Originally posted by SpitFire1299
    I dis-agree.

    The halo is forcefed, therefore there is constant pressure on the balls, so when the bolt opens for a ball to come in it is forced in rather than dropped in.

    :)
    Remember there are 2 types of Halo's.

    the TSA adgitator kind and the force fed belt driven.

    Comment

    • SpitFire1299
      :P
      • Jun 2004
      • 1765

      #17
      Originally posted by siloseven
      Remember there are 2 types of Halo's.

      the TSA adgitator kind and the force fed belt driven.
      Oh yeah.. thats right. Im talking about the Halo B though.. force fed belt driven.

      Comment

      • MoeMag
        Still here.
        • Dec 2005
        • 1821

        #18

        Comment

        • geekwarrior
          MIA
          • Oct 2005
          • 2581

          #19

          how do you distinguish the sound of 30 bps vs 40 bps? I would love to beleive it and see it. But until there is a vid of it, with a sound anaylsis, its only a rumor.

          Comment

          • yeahthatsme
            aka yeahthatswang
            • Sep 2002
            • 2592

            #20

            you can have single shot shoot down, it happens all the time. the reg just cant keep up with the speed, so every few shots it doesnt fill all the way and causes shoot down. shoot down doesnt lead to imminent misfires.
            [*img]http://www.browndotdesign.com/Xodus/AO/YeahThatsMe.jpg[/img]
            Image too large- Tato

            Comment

            • magman007
              I <3 my Penis
              • Jun 2001
              • 7579

              #21

              Im a Pilot as well, and I'm damn sure of my aerodynamics. This is not the first time it has happened, thats the thing. Tom, Doc, Manike, and many others have commented on this before, and have given the reasoning that i gave you many a time before. just search for mid air breaking or something like that, and you will find the posts I am reffering to.



              Originally posted by Tom in reffrence to a post saying he acted like my dad...
              "That's right!
              WHO'S YOUR DADDY!!"
              ALL QUIT AND NO GO!!! Team Icky Forest-Shatnerball 2003!!!
              www.tunamart.com
              DONT SUPPORT HYPOCRITICAL MISSLEAD YOUTH, BOYCOTT HK

              Comment

              • Spartan X
                EviL Ambassador
                • Apr 2003
                • 1296

                #22
                They had that problem with some of the prototype videos of the MQ valved cocker too if I remember correctly.

                with a Viking and the scm/2liter you would never have to worry about shoot down at any speeds
                EviL-

                Oh come Hither my Evil friends. Let us dance upon our MINION of pure EviL apon the sup air ball field. Let us give thanks for this EviL OMEN that the Lord AVATAR has given to us. Let us crawl apon this wicked earth, converting the people to our HEATHEN ways, let us PIMP them with our SCION. Let us be faithfull till Judgement day, when EviL shall finally RULE THE WORLD.

                http://www.nazgulclan.com/ryouko/fridaynight3-1.wmv

                http://www.greenshines.com/control/media/1078969315.wmv

                Comment

                • shorty24
                  Micro-pnue...
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 643

                  #23
                  Originally posted by HuD1Ni
                  I have my facts straight.. the karni was in some mode I thought to be " training" that made it not fully cycle.. I just didn't mention it.. as to the ion, maybe I have my numbers off, but it went faster than the viking in zak vetters test. I know it had a t-board, QEV and some other modifications.. I don't have the video but I saw it on a friends comp
                  As far as I know, Zak Vetter's infamous test was the Automag RT (not Viking) speed test w/ vid at 34.5 bps. And until I see vids/goldwave of something faster, I won't believe it.

                  Ah yes, the Karni. I remember that vid, too. But like we said, the point is moot, due to the fact that it was quite obviously not fully cycling.

                  Over on PBN, and even here sometimes, this thread will come up and some douche replies "a Spyder can cycle faster than anything out there"...yeah, great. Show me proof, and I'll believe it.

                  I am currently working on a project that will be able to test the absolute max speed of any marker w/ or w/o paint as long as trigger pull isn't ridiculously ginormous. More details to come later...
                  Feedback

                  Comment

                  • SCpoloRicker
                    HA HA I'm custom!!1
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 4375

                    #24
                    *monocle owls*
                    God....I guess I was probably returning videotapes.

                    Comment

                    • HuD1Ni
                      yes, it is funny isn't it
                      • Feb 2006
                      • 248

                      #25
                      talking of speed, some dude claims he can shoot is trilogy sport 12 bps... stock no ups.. I found this to be..

                      Comment

                      • punkncat
                        One foot less
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 5841

                        #26
                        Did Zak actually have paint feeding to that, or just cycling with the pressure kicked way up? I remember him doing one so demonstrate the RT effect, but not feeding paint.

                        His Viking video is shooting at what BPS?

                        Several of the other claims I call shens on until I see proof...especially that 30+ BPS out of an Impy thing. I have seen Imps starve out going around 20 due to restricted air passages...I simply cannot believe that is true w/o something other than "I saw it".


                        I realize there is a 15BPS cap. That in no way has anything to do with what I am asking. Thanks for the (obvious) input though guys.....

                        Comment

                        • Arstron
                          fusionowners.org

                          • Mar 2005
                          • 2347

                          #27
                          Zaks viking was shooting at 32 and the mag at 34.5 and both was shooting paint.
                          http://www.zakvetter.com/

                          Comment

                          • SlartyBartFast
                            The Flying Scotsman
                            • Jun 2002
                            • 2940

                            #28
                            What you were "cursed" with is a hyperactive imagination. How did you "see" 40bps?

                            Human eyes and ears are useless at determining BPS as are all on gun counters and displays.

                            Until there's a video, with good sound analysis, All claims = Shenanigans.

                            And do you really know your physics? Doesn't look like it:

                            60 bps = 1 ball every 1/60th of a second
                            300 fps for 1/60 of a second = 5 feet between each ball in the string.

                            How the BLEEP does something as small as a paintball "draft" another paintball that's 5 ft ahead? It may as well be in the next county. To draft, paintballs would need to be within a fraction of an inch of each other.

                            So, until you start shooting in the vicinity of 3600 bps or more (at which point balls would be 1 inch apart) drop the idea of drafting.

                            The only reason two paintballs meet in midair is:
                            - they're being shot head on
                            - the first one was much slower than the second
                            - pure serendipity as the random motion of one curves out and back while the other miraculously does the opposite or continues in a straight line.

                            Comment

                            • geekwarrior
                              MIA
                              • Oct 2005
                              • 2581

                              #29
                              Originally posted by SlartyBartFast
                              The only reason two paintballs meet in midair is:
                              - they're being shot head on
                              - the first one was much slower than the second
                              - pure serendipity as the random motion of one curves out and back while the other miraculously does the opposite or continues in a straight line.

                              thats what I was thinking....if you had crappy paint, which was probaby used for this test, you probably had inconsistant size, so one was going faster than the other?

                              Comment

                              • punkncat
                                One foot less
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 5841

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Arstron
                                Zaks viking was shooting at 32 and the mag at 34.5 and both was shooting paint.
                                http://www.zakvetter.com/

                                Nice

                                Comment

                                Working...