shocker or dm5 ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • buzzboy
    Emo grass cuts inself
    • Mar 2005
    • 1322

    #16
    Originally posted by SpitFire1299
    **I forgot to mention.. buzzboy said the shocker board was better, but the DM5 board has the removable chip.. so instead of upgrading boards, you can upgrade your chip and save $$.
    Thanks spitfire. Thats one thing I left out. The DM's are great because of the ease of changing the chips instead of the whole board.

    Comment

    • SpitFire1299
      :P
      • Jun 2004
      • 1765

      #17
      Originally posted by buzzboy
      Thanks spitfire. Thats one thing I left out. The DM's are great because of the ease of changing the chips instead of the whole board.
      Yeah, i bet you were thinking about the PM5.. which doesnt have that option.

      Comment

      • gruntbull

        #18
        Here is the long short of it.... (owned both, still have my DM5)

        Honestly Shockers are prolly the cheapest made POS I have seen in a while that sell over 250 range. The quality or lack there of is disappointing to say the least. Also the way they developed the Shocker I am rather jaded on... I dont care for their trigger adjustment ideas either.

        For the DM5 honest I can say I enjoy this marker, and I am amazed that it isnt as popular as the POS SFT...
        Such a better marker all the way around, the aluminum is better quality, milling is better (NOT perfect but better) and the overall fit and feel is very good.

        As an anodizer, I will say that the SHOCKER is subpar in material for intended use to the DM5.

        Comment

        • AZ_09
          Registered User
          • Jul 2006
          • 340

          #19
          I myself dont like neither of my 2 friend's shockers. The trigger, is just odd to me. Plus, they get horrible effieciency.

          Comment

          • 68magOwner
            Registered User
            • May 2003
            • 3475

            #20
            its odd, i would say without hesitation that the Dm5 is a better marker than the shocker, but, at the same time, i still highly prefer the shocker over the dm5. IT is, and always will be a personal preferance thing.

            Comment

            • ttink
              Registered User
              • Aug 2005
              • 317

              #21
              Originally posted by mag_lover05
              FEP quest.

              looks better then a shocker, still single tube designe, only 3 orings hold air
              :tup: I really like these markers, though i haven't shot one, i would love to try one out.

              Comment

              • Shotcaller509
                It's The "M.O.B" Boy!!!
                • Mar 2006
                • 121

                #22
                Shocker VS DM5

                I think you would be satisfied with either or. Ive shot both and also had the same choice as you on the exact 2 markers. After shooting both I decided to go with the Shocker. I have a black heart board in it and I tell you with the aftermarket board it totally destroy's the DM5. Although I have never shot a dm5 with an upped board. Also the shocker to me is a lot smaller and lighter. It felt to me the the Dye just had too much height for me. Well thats a little bit of info hope it helps.

                Comment

                Working...