New Barrel? AMAZING!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Webmaster
    Former Moderator

    • Oct 2000
    • 1765

    #16
    its a METAL TUBE!!! Bore sizing only works in a limited fashion! No amount of doo hickeys are going to give you amazing lazer accuracy!!!

    And certainly not 1" of control bore!

    Problems or questions with the site or your account? Email me: [email protected] I collect old guns and paintball gear. Email me if you have stuff to sell!

    Paintball Never Dies - www.vintagerex.com

    Comment

    • ShinyGuy
      Elves like shiny
      • May 2001
      • 226

      #17
      Doc hit the nail on the head. Nevertheless, I'd like to see someone try the concept for a longer distance. It probably wont work with existing barrel threads since the first inch or two of the barrel has to fit inside the body of the marker.

      Comment

      • a_malfunction
        Damnit! It Malfunctioned!
        • Feb 2001
        • 1779

        #18
        Originally posted by nutz
        even if it doesnt work..... at least they tryed! nothing bad ever comes from trying! well, most of the time atleast

        Try? There is no try! Do or do not!
        -Gig 'Em Ags!

        Comment

        • Ityl
          Registered User
          • Nov 2000
          • 706

          #19
          [i]And certainly not 1" of control bore! [/B]
          unless you talk to OTP
          I like potatoes

          Comment

          • Miscue
            Super Moderator

            • Oct 2000
            • 7105

            #20
            I'm awaiting the rubber teflon coated barrel that stretches to fit your paint.

            Comment

            • cphilip
              Former Moderator

              • Jun 2026
              • 16216

              #21
              Originally posted by Miscue
              I'm awaiting the rubber teflon coated barrel that stretches to fit your paint.

              I was actualy thinking of trying that! Until you posted and it now sounds so rediculous...


              I must say the darn thing sure has some cool factor going for it however worthless it may turn out to be.




              AGD, where we are so good we can do it with only ONE tube!

              cphilip.com

              Comment

              • shartley
                • Jun 2026

                #22
                Try? There is no try! Do or do not!

                Comment

                • cphilip
                  Former Moderator

                  • Jun 2026
                  • 16216

                  #23
                  You know years ago I was faced with the delema of how to extract or collect Semen from a Rabbit. Seriously! And I constructed a device with a piece or PVC pipe and inserted a large rubber tubing and then folded the ends over at each end of the tube. I drilled a hole through the side and glued on a shraeder (sp?) valve. Into this valve we would pump warm water with a large syringe to inflate the inside of the "Artificial Vagina" to close or open the inside diameter of the thing as needed and create the warmth needed to simulate a Rabbits Vagina. One end was for the Rabbit to ejaculate into and the other was where a test tube for collection of the semen was inserted and the semen would run into it. With proper lubrication, stimulus from a "teaser" Doe, a Rabbit skin wrapped over the handlers arm and (very important) proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) to keep the Buck from biting the snot out of you, we succeeded in collect in Rabbit semen with great results...


                  ...now that I have lost you let me try and make my point...


                  An inflatable diaphram type of barrel, same prinipal as above only on one end, I envisioned a while back but I was too scared to even bring this forth until now. Think about it. You could use air or some kind of fluid even. Sounded crazy until now.

                  The above is a true story...Let the Rabbit jokes begin...


                  AGD, where we are so good we can do it with only ONE tube!

                  cphilip.com

                  Comment

                  • shartley
                    • Jun 2026

                    #24

                    Comment

                    • media
                      Registered User
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 64

                      #25
                      I'm willing to bet the "amazing" hot female rabbit vagina simulator semen collector works better than the "amazing" self adjusting barrel.

                      The barrel might turn out to be "cheap" and you'll feel ripped off.

                      The rabbit vagina simulator might leave you feeling "cheap" but at least the rabbit will enjoy himself.
                      Chew your food before you swallow and you can be president someday too!

                      Comment

                      • Webmaster
                        Former Moderator

                        • Oct 2000
                        • 1765

                        #26
                        Shartley says: "It may not be the best way to do it, but at least someone is giving it a shot... But the fact that they are trying is a good thing."

                        Wait wait - you are CONSTANTLY pointed out faults in other peoples work from AGD to APG and everything in between. Insisting that anything other than 100% quality for the superbolts was unproffessional and unaccptable. Then you condemn APG for thier lackluster quality and editing. When someone defends those people as them trying to do thier best - you dismiss it, that in the professional world perfection is the only acceptable result.

                        Then you come on here and take some gimmick piece of junk with the likely hood of any possible performance enhancements near the zero range - and you give them "cherri-ho good try, chap!" slap on the back?

                        I thought you were a perfectionist - maybe your real motive is to just say the opposite of popular concensus for attention.

                        Problems or questions with the site or your account? Email me: [email protected] I collect old guns and paintball gear. Email me if you have stuff to sell!

                        Paintball Never Dies - www.vintagerex.com

                        Comment

                        • thecavemankevin
                          the living un-banned
                          • Feb 2001
                          • 4346

                          #27
                          Mini(rabit) stop humping the pvc pipe

                          the only problem would that i can think of with phils idea would be a sort of wave effect.

                          Invision a watter bed, there are waves that will come back and mess with the second ball after the first one is fired.
                          Plus don't forget about uneven friction, that will distort the balls direction.

                          can't wait to see the communities reaction


                          Webmaster, i have thought the same about Shartley for a long time.


                          Quote: MarkM
                          "virus attacks have been dealt with, same with back door nasties. ."

                          My feed back

                          Comment

                          • cphilip
                            Former Moderator

                            • Jun 2026
                            • 16216

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Webmaster
                            ...maybe your real motive is to just say the opposite of popular concensus...
                            Ah Ha! You have punctured close to the heart of the Shartley mistique! He is "the Devil" for sure

                            Hey you two don't be overshadowing my Rabbit story will ya!?!?!?


                            AGD, where we are so good we can do it with only ONE tube!

                            cphilip.com

                            Comment

                            • cphilip
                              Former Moderator

                              • Jun 2026
                              • 16216

                              #29
                              Originally posted by thecavemankevin
                              the only problem would that i can think of with phils idea would be a sort of wave effect.

                              NO...not with real thick rubber tubeing. That eliminates that problem. However I am certain in my previous application that the "wave" motion may have enhanced the specimen volume? Only a theory that I do not intend to prove out.


                              I was gonna say this might just be a topic approaching the worthy of "Deep Blue" now but upon reflection it may be more like "Deep Do Do"...


                              AGD, where we are so good we can do it with only ONE tube!

                              cphilip.com

                              Comment

                              • shartley
                                • Jun 2026

                                #30
                                Webmaster
                                Shartley says: "It may not be the best way to do it, but at least someone is giving it a shot... But the fact that they are trying is a good thing."

                                Wait wait - you are CONSTANTLY pointed out faults in other peoples work from AGD to APG and everything in between. Insisting that anything other than 100% quality for the superbolts was unproffessional and unaccptable. Then you condemn APG for thier lackluster quality and editing. When someone defends those people as them trying to do thier best - you dismiss it, that in the professional world perfection is the only acceptable result.

                                Then you come on here and take some gimmick piece of junk with the likely hood of any possible performance enhancements near the zero range - and you give them "cherri-ho good try, chap!" slap on the back?

                                I thought you were a perfectionist - maybe your real motive is to just say the opposite of popular concensus for attention.

                                Comment

                                Working...