So I've decided to get a Warp Bodied Tac One. However, this begs a discussion, Q Loader or Warp? Functionality only, not cost.
-
-
Qloader:
Pros:
Lower Profile
Lighter
No Batteries
More Mounting Options
Cons:
Can't Reload While Shooting
Lower Capacity
Takes Longer To Load -
Depends on a few things. Do you want to use batteries? The lack of electronics makes the Q loader a wise choice for that route.
Do you want speed? The Q loader wins that debate fairly clearly.
Do you want reliability? For this I would chose a warp feed with a revvy.
I have owned/used both a q loader and a warp. Both have pros and cons.
Your best bet is to try both out and see which you like best.
Hope this helps!
MikeComment
-
With dual 9 volts running at 9 volts the batteries will last forever and it will shoot as fast as you can pull using a revvy.Comment
-
Thanks for all the feedback. I like the suggestion of try both and see what you like, so I'll start with a warp and go from there.Originally posted by Tunaman
Comment
-
Ive been using the same warp w/ a pre-BE revvy since 1999 or 2000.
The only thing ive replaced is the warp belt and batteries.HR minimag
Benchmark rail(red)
Drop zone 2(red)
Blade INTELLIFRAME
WARP feed(clear)/12v Rev
114 crossfire hps
10" dye ss barrelComment
Comment