2002 matrix LCD

[brian terry]

a crazy i love that pic hehehe nice....////

[FeelTheRT]

Originally posted by Ityl
The only things I see wrong with the gun:

1. effeciency (not a big deal really)
2. looks (not a big deal either)
3. size, bigger than an emag (only real downfall)

the efficancy isn't that bad. You the current stock stock Matrices get about 700-800 out of a 68/45. After bolt mod which some Matrices already come with, you get around 1300 shots with a 68/45.

I guess you could say it looks abit plain... but i do'nt think its ugly at all.

Oh geez, EVERY gun is bigger than the Emag. Comparing to an Angel, the Matrix is only about 1.5" taller.

I think it's a really great gun, it's very accurate, and can't chop paint with a LPR.

[manike]

Originally posted by FeelTheRT
and can't chop paint with a LPR.

That's not 100% true. They can still chop paint but it is much less likely. Greg Handed me his own personal gun and asked me to try and chop... I obliged

But it took effort and mostly it just pinched or bounced back off the balls that didn't feed perfectly.

It is the least likely of any gun, without an ACE, to chop paint but it still possible to chop with delicate paint that it catches wrong...

manike

[steveg]

Imagine a lpr matrix with ACE

OH-OH-OH has anyone mentioned lighter than a Cocker yet?