I would guess... without the plots to prove it...
it takes a certain number of ft-lbs of air to launch a ball.
Higher pressure guns use a smaller volume of high pressure air to fire the ball ie... short duration high pressure spike.
Low pressure guns use a larger volume of low pressure air to fire the ball ie... long duration low pressure spike
In theory, a gun running at low pressure should use the same amount of uncompressed* air as a gun running at high pressure to fire a ball at 300 fps. Although, I keep on seeing posts saying how inefficient low pressure guns are, I have never seen data to prove it.
*by uncompressed I mean the volume of air released into the atmosphere when the gun is fired.
So, I don't think all low pressure guns have the problem Tom is talking about... just the ones that don't use enough low pressure air.
This brings up another question... what affect does the barrel porting have on this phenomena?
Tom, have you actually measured negative pressures after the ball has passed a certian point in the barrel?
Interesting...
it takes a certain number of ft-lbs of air to launch a ball.
Higher pressure guns use a smaller volume of high pressure air to fire the ball ie... short duration high pressure spike.
Low pressure guns use a larger volume of low pressure air to fire the ball ie... long duration low pressure spike
In theory, a gun running at low pressure should use the same amount of uncompressed* air as a gun running at high pressure to fire a ball at 300 fps. Although, I keep on seeing posts saying how inefficient low pressure guns are, I have never seen data to prove it.
*by uncompressed I mean the volume of air released into the atmosphere when the gun is fired.
So, I don't think all low pressure guns have the problem Tom is talking about... just the ones that don't use enough low pressure air.
This brings up another question... what affect does the barrel porting have on this phenomena?
Tom, have you actually measured negative pressures after the ball has passed a certian point in the barrel?
Interesting...

Comment