b2k2 review at rumbleme.com

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cha0tic
    g0t mag?
    • Feb 2001
    • 1990

    #1

    b2k2 review at rumbleme.com

    i was looking at the b2k2 review at rumbleme.com thought some things were out of place....

    "Acurracy:
    The gun could shoot about 156 feet acurately shooting at 242 fps. After that the balls would loosen up by about 1 inch or so."


    this has to be the most accurate pb gun in the world....

    "Vertical feed makes it harder to chop balls while on rapid fire."

    i thought powerfeed was faster, vert feed just made the gun more balanced.

    "Instead of aiming down the barrel you aim through the side but with the B2K2 running on nitro you barely have to aim to hit a person you just point and shoot."

    whats your reasoning in this?

    sorry, this may seem like a flame, i just thought that this article could have been written better. say somthing if you disagree with me...
  • X-Plosive
    AO's sexiest member, and biggest post whore :)
    • Mar 2001
    • 1807

    #2
    hmmmm interesting. Manike did show us some calculations that proves vertical feed to be faster than powerfeed, however in guns with larger ammounts of blowback vertical feeds chops balls. Bushmasters don't have much blowback do they do?


    Taking mags apart is fun, its even more fun when you don't know what you're doing

    Comment

    • Cha0tic
      g0t mag?
      • Feb 2001
      • 1990

      #3
      i'm not familiar with the bm2k's blowback. i have only shot one once before. thank you for the correction.

      Comment

      • X-Plosive
        AO's sexiest member, and biggest post whore :)
        • Mar 2001
        • 1807

        #4
        okay now I'm going to tackle the first point.

        The author had to write something about the accuracy of the gun. I ASSUME that 242 is a normal velocity for him(indoor fields). He must of then proceeded to shoot the gun at several distances and found he was able to shoot 156 feet while maintaining a tight shot grouping. I hope he found an acurate way to measure the distance. I see how his tests don't prove much or don't appear very scientific but he MUST talk about accuracy, because it is a crucial part of a review. What do you expect him to say? I suppose he was fairly detailed. I assume the authors accuracy was limited by recoil. Accuracy of a paintball marker is really based on the weight of the gun, and the ammount of blowback, these two factors are dependant on one another.

        The problem is that he left out a lot of deatail, was the gun in a proper vise?


        That was the best explanation I could come up with, somewtimes we must assume the author is intelligent.

        I'm still working on theories for that last idea, it's just out there.


        Taking mags apart is fun, its even more fun when you don't know what you're doing

        Comment

        • Cha0tic
          g0t mag?
          • Feb 2001
          • 1990

          #5
          152 feet is pretty far, and then the shots spaced out an inch or so? thats very hard...

          Comment

          • Minimag4me
            Registered User
            • Jul 2001
            • 779

            #6
            If the gun is so accurate and you dont aim you wont hit anything. You will just be shooting a good stream and missing with every one.
            -Minimag Body HR
            -Retro Valve
            -Z grip with extender
            -12V X-Boarded Revvy
            -6 barrels including:10 Inch DYE SS, 8 inch Steel Wind, 8 inch stock minimag barrel, 12 inch BOA barrel, 12 inch Lapco Autospirit, 16 inch SPAA
            -68/3000 Flatline

            Comment

            Working...