Hey I just figured out what dark matter is!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MoeMag
    Still here.
    • Dec 2005
    • 1821

    #1

    Hey I just figured out what dark matter is!!!

  • snoopay700
    Serious About Men

    • Jan 2006
    • 3071

    #2
    I have a problem with dark matter, it just doesn't make sense really lol. I dunno, it's fun to mess around with and everything, but when it comes to plausibility, string theory is where it's at. That explains why our universe is the way it is and why it defies logic a lot better than dark matter, although both can't be proven really.

    Sorry, it's late, and i'm tired, need to get up in 5 hours to take my older brother paintballing for the first time, i'll read your post later and comment on it then, i just figured i had to say my stance on dark matter.
    Il n'y a point de sots si incommodes que ceux qui ont de l'esprit.

    Comment

    • MoeMag
      Still here.
      • Dec 2005
      • 1821

      #3
      Oops. I just figured out why it wont work! lol well sort of... IDK that is assuming that I stick with the simple definition of gravity that seems to work. E-cookie to who figures it out my oops, and a nobel prize to who ever tells me why it wont matte(r).
      Last edited by MoeMag; 07-12-2008, 01:23 AM.

      Comment

      • LK-13
        Confused on purpose!
        • Dec 2006
        • 584

        #4


        the speed of light may not be an absolute.
        this would change your results.





        Comment

        • Hilltop Customs
          Registered User
          • Aug 2007
          • 1260

          #5
          wrong because your assuming e=mc^2 is a 2 way street? ie: if you have so much energy it is equivalent to some mass(and therefore has the same gravity of that mass). But there is no way to create mass from pure energy.

          Or how about energy doesnt like to group together, look at the sun, massive amt of gravity, but the energy is still given off by the sun. Even black holes dont pull the energy given off by a nearby star, they pull the mass thats creating the energy off the nearby star. Only after the mass from the star is integrated into the black hole, the energy can no longer escape.

          energy must have some gravity observing qualities, or you would see some given off by black holes, but that doesnt mean that energy has its own gravity.


          i have no idea if thats right, but Ive always wanted an e-cookie

          Comment

          • MoeMag
            Still here.
            • Dec 2005
            • 1821

            #6
            The black hole is called that because nothing can escape its gravitational pull... thats why they are black in every part of spectrum. we can only see the gas that is giving off energy that is beyond the event horizon, where some energy 'light' may still escape. so... that shows that energy cannot even escape gravity at a certain point. So I think thats a plus for me showing that they are related.

            wrong because your assuming e=mc^2 is a 2 way street? ie: if you have so much energy it is equivalent to some mass(and therefore has the same gravity of that mass). But there is no way to create mass from pure energy.

            Comment

            • Avianrave
              Registered User
              • Jun 2008
              • 146

              #7
              I would be more impressed if you told me what makes a proton one charge, and an electron the opposite charge.

              Comment

              • LK-13
                Confused on purpose!
                • Dec 2006
                • 584

                #8
                Originally posted by MoeMag
                The black hole is called that because nothing can escape its gravitational pull... thats why they are black in every part of spectrum. we can only see the gas that is giving off energy that is beyond the event horizon, where some energy 'light' may still escape. so... that shows that energy cannot even escape gravity at a certain point. So I think thats a plus for me showing that they are related.
                actually this is no longer correct.
                Steven Hawking discovered that Black Holes have a temperature. 3 degrees Kelvin. (really damned cold)
                if a Black Hole has a measurable temperature it has to be emitting something.
                Hawking was proved correct and the radiation coming out of Black Holes is now named after him;

                Hawking Radiation.

                Comment

                • MoeMag
                  Still here.
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 1821

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Avianrave
                  I would be more impressed if you told me what makes a proton one charge, and an electron the opposite charge.

                  Comment

                  • MoeMag
                    Still here.
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 1821

                    #10
                    Originally posted by LK-13
                    actually this is no longer correct.
                    Steven Hawking discovered that Black Holes have a temperature. 3 degrees Kelvin. (really damned cold)
                    if a Black Hole has a measurable temperature it has to be emitting something.
                    Hawking was proved correct and the radiation coming out of Black Holes is now named after him;

                    Hawking Radiation.

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
                    Last edited by MoeMag; 07-12-2008, 04:25 PM.

                    Comment

                    • neppo1345
                      I Will Eat Your Children..
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 1913

                      #11
                      LHC goes online in 25 days...

                      Lets just wait...ehh?

                      Comment

                      • ThePixelGuru
                        Guru of Pixels
                        • May 2005
                        • 1461

                        #12
                        You think C is a constant, eh? There's a lot of tricks of relativity where C isn't C.

                        Take a light bulb, for instance. It releases photons in every direction. Pick two that are going opposite directions. Relative to the light bulb, both move at the speed of light, C. How fast does one photon move relative to the other?

                        Or, more concisely, if a man moving at the speed of light holds a mirror in front of him, can he see his reflection?

                        Comment

                        Working...