Obama Phone ?

[cockerpunk]

Actually being correct is not mutually exclusive to being an arrogant narcissistic jerk.

Again, I am just stating a fact.

and again, i think its funny that by posting the correct facts about obamaphone, you think i am being "an arrogant narcissistic jerk."

You are such a buffoon

Why don't you go back to that one paintball site where children blindly respect you? It might help keep that ego inflated.

your two quotes don't reveal anything new or interesting. i already explained them fully.

I found this to actually be very informative:

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/05/con...l-phone-claim/

ah, someone else who is interested in facts. since no one else will give you a warm welcome and will call you "an arrogant narcissistic jerk" for posting good information correcting OP, i will have to. welcome to the train-wreck that is the AO obamaphone thread.

[Ando]

Go away.

[Lohman446]

ah, someone else who is interested in facts. since no one else will give you a warm welcome and will call you "an arrogant narcissistic jerk" for posting good information correcting OP, i will have to. welcome to the train-wreck that is the AO obamaphone thread.

I find it interesting that you believe I called you that as looking back I never actually did.

I would not apply it to emcl29 as he was actually able to post information without being condescending which is an important trait in having viable poltiical discussion.

[El Zilcho]

I find it interesting that you believe I called you that as looking back I never actually did.

I would not apply it to emcl29 as he was actually able to post information without being condescending which is an important trait in having viable poltiical discussion.

The real irony is that I am very much an arrogant narcissistic jerk

[cockerpunk]

I would not apply it to emcl29 as he was actually able to post information without being condescending which is an important trait in having viable poltiical discussion.

my post:

http://www.examiner.com/article/gop-...008-under-bush

his post:

I found this to actually be very informative:

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/05/con...l-phone-claim/

so what you saying is that i need to preface all my links with "I found this to actually be very informative" and then i don't come off looking like "an arrogant and narcissistic jerk?" but of course posting a link, without commentary or opinion, makes me an arrogant and narcissistic jerk?

ok, that makes sense. if its that easy, i'll remember to do that next time

[Lohman446]

my post:



his post:




so what you saying is that i need to preface all my links with "I found this to actually be very informative" and then i don't come off looking like "an arrogant and narcissistic jerk?" but of course posting a link, without commentary or opinion, makes me an arrogant and narcissistic jerk?

ok, that makes sense. if its that easy, i'll remember to do that next time

judging from this thread, it looks like a day to show how uninformed half the population is because of there rumor mill conservative media.

Nice card stacking argument where you ignore any evidence (such as your own insulting statement) that does not support your own conclusion. Its considered a fallacy of logic for a reason.

[cockerpunk]

Nice card stacking argument where you ignore any evidence (such as your own insulting statement) that does not support your own conclusion. Its considered a fallacy of logic for a reason.

that post is not insulting, its purely factual. and the thread was already tranwrecked by people calling me names for merely posting that link. some even stepped over the line and into flaming me quite personally. all before i said a single word in this thread.

so no, you can't even claim that.

[Lohman446]

that post is not insulting, its purely factual. and the thread was already tranwrecked by people calling me names for merely posting that link. some even stepped over the line and into flaming me quite personally. all before i said a single word in this thread.

so no, you can't even claim that.

I see one post that insulted you directly by one person. And if you cannot see how what you said was insulting and condescending there is a valid argument that said poster may have been right. If said argument can be made perhaps he was simply stating something he believed to be purely factual which, by your logic, would not be insulting.

[going_home]

The program does exist.
The free phone is a fact.
Just because you don't like the mocking nickname
doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

[cockerpunk]

The program does exist.
The free phone is a fact.
Just because you don't like the mocking nickname
doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

no where did i content that a program for low income families/folks to get cell phones didn't exist.

swing and a miss.

[Ando]

some even stepped over the line and into flaming me quite personally

It's kind of hard not too when you've made a name for yourself as being a complete douche bag. Your opinion and status here has and always will be considered irrelevant. And calling anything you find on the internet as "purely factual" explains a lot about you.

Stop Trolling.

[cockerpunk]

I see one post that insulted you directly by one person. And if you cannot see how what you said was insulting and condescending there is a valid argument that said poster may have been right. If said argument can be made perhaps he was simply stating something he believed to be purely factual which, by your logic, would not be insulting.

facts are not insulting or condescending. posting a correction to someones false information is not insulting or condescending. if you form your opinion on false information, and feel insulted when someone posts a correction, thats your problem, not mine. im not going to sugar coat it for you.

[cockerpunk]

It's kind of hard not too when you've made a name for yourself as being a complete douche bag. Your opinion and status here has and always will be considered irrelevant. And calling anything you find on the internet as "purely factual" explains a lot about you.

i have never stated an opinion, and have never claimed a status. i also never claimed anything i found was purely factual.

swing and a miss.

[Lohman446]

facts are not insulting or condescending. posting a correction to someones false information is not insulting or condescending. if you form your opinion on false information, and feel insulted when someone posts a correction, thats your problem, not mine. im not going to sugar coat it for you.

None of my posts had anything to do with the content of the information offered in this thread.

When you feel the need to correct someone in a condescending manner rather than simply offering the information it speaks of arrogance and narcissism. Its the reason why reasonable political discourse often does not occur.

[cockerpunk]

None of my posts had anything to do with the content of the information offered in this thread.

When you feel the need to correct someone in a condescending manner rather than simply offering the information it speaks of arrogance and narcissism. Its the reason why reasonable political discourse often does not occur.

this is my first post in this thread, the one that destroyed the thread, 100% complete and unedited:

http://www.examiner.com/article/gop-...008-under-bush

so, lohamn, is this post

A - "correct(ing) someone in a condescending manner"

or

B - "simply offering (up) the information"

you tell me.