2 Are Better Than 1 ?
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
-
I am not a 1911 fan to be honest, I dont like the grip safety or the whole locked and cocked thing.
For the money you cant go wrong with an M&P.

Comment
-
I carry a Glock, which I consider functionally synonymous with M&Ps and XDs. The majority of all three are durable and reliable, but all three have also had lemons and issues. There are fanboys and haters of each. I just like the Glock's lower barrel axis.
However, for simple shooting fun, my 1911 is much more enjoyable.Last of the Salzburg ClanComment
-
1911's are heavier and easy to reacquire the target, no doubt fun range guns.
I have had no luck with Glocks, they just dont fit my hand.
Kahrs, M&P's, F.N.Herstal's fit me better.

Comment
-
Comment
-
5.7x28 (5 seven) is 32 (2,350 ft/s) and 40 grain (1,950 ft/s) , but its one of only two pistol calibers (that I know of) that can defeat level 3 kevlar. (many bad guy types have been known to wear kevlar when committing crimes)
The other is a cold war relic 7.62x25 Tokarev 85 grain (1650 fp/s).
I have shot one of the latter, Romanian TTC, poor mans 5 seven, 1911 knockoff that goes in the $200-ish range while the 5 seven $1k-ish.
The TTC is a blast to shoot but I wouldnt carry it simply because of the whole locked and cocked thing.
I prefer a DB9 or a PM9 for that.
The distance from the backstrap to the trigger is too great for small hands like mine.

Comment
-
I will regret posting this in the morning, but I have access to scrap ballistic Kevlar from work used to contain turbine blades from the fuselage of aircraft. A PMC .223 55gr FMJ round from a 16.25" barrel at ~25 ft went through 60 layers and buried itself into the tree that I wrapped it around. A 180gr FMJRN from a Glock 23 also at ~25 ft stopped on the first layer, although severely mushroomed.
It makes for an interesting argument for energy over momentum.Last of the Salzburg ClanComment





Comment