So...How's it going?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pyrate Jim
    Shi Tamajutsu Ka
    • May 2002
    • 1052

    #346
    A fully Partisan State?
    CT Co-ordinator, Paintball Marshals

    Comment

    • maniacmechanic
      PrestonCoPaintball
      • Aug 2006
      • 3453

      #347
      Nobody ,,, You do realize that in order to get warrants for arrest. 1) you have to commit a crime
      That is a BS statement , Just like everything else you say ,,,,, to get a warrant ,,,, You Have to be ACCUSED of a crime
      And the progressive left has figured out, by using Mass Media and repeating the same lie over & over some folks will believe

      Comment

      • Nobody
        Nobody's Perfect
        • Oct 2001
        • 3384

        #348
        Originally posted by maniacmechanic
        Nobody ,,, You do realize that in order to get warrants for arrest. 1) you have to commit a crime
        That is a BS statement , Just like everything else you say ,,,,, to get a warrant ,,,, You Have to be ACCUSED of a crime
        And the progressive left has figured out, by using Mass Media and repeating the same lie over & over some folks will believe
        You see. You are the good lapdog of your betters and blame the media, the mass media. Because everyone knows that in order to get a trial, you have to ask public opinion on it through a journalist. Forget courts, forget rules. You have to break a law and then be ruled against it.

        Now, you can accuse anyone of a crime. Look at Joe and Hunter Biden. Who many accusations have been thrown their way and yet, no evidence of any crime has been committed. And before you get your panties in a bunch about Hunter living off his last name, when Donald's kids do the exact same thing.

        Comment

        • going_home
          Hebrews 13:8

          • Dec 2004
          • 8343

          #349
          The evidence against the Bidens is real and in living color and will be made manifest.

          The Democrats know he will lose so they will end up assisting in his demise so they can choose another "not Kamala Harris"...... IQ 75......

          Comment

          • going_home
            Hebrews 13:8

            • Dec 2004
            • 8343

            #350
            Here's a couple good questions for the prognosticators:

            1] Who will be Trump's VP choice

            2] Who will be the democrat presidential candidate

            Comment

            • Pyrate Jim
              Shi Tamajutsu Ka
              • May 2002
              • 1052

              #351
              Originally posted by going_home
              Here's a couple good questions for the prognosticators:

              1] Who will be Trump's VP choice

              2] Who will be the democrat presidential candidate

              It would be a low number to calculate this far out.
              1] The safe bet is it won't be anyone who voted against him in the past. That narrows the field a bit (or a lot).
              2] Perhaps Jussie Smollet or Alec Baldwin would be a more viable option than anyone currently in the field of Democrat contenders.

              The People are a fickle lot (bless their little hearts), and many of them will turn on a dime to support or attack anything that gets their attention even if it's a direct contradiction of last week's big thing that they were mad about. So, trying to see too far ahead is dependent on too many variables that change very quickly.
              Some things are easier to predict based on history. The Gov't did before, they'll do it again, and let the people pay for it just like every other time.
              Spend billions on Green New Deal.
              Green new deal goes bankrupt (it's happening now, right in front of us).
              Spend billions to bail out green companies. (coming soon)

              Lather, Rinse, Repeat.
              CT Co-ordinator, Paintball Marshals

              Comment

              • Nobody
                Nobody's Perfect
                • Oct 2001
                • 3384

                #352
                Originally posted by going_home
                The evidence against the Bidens is real and in living color and will be made manifest.

                The Democrats know he will ,tthey will end up assisting in his demise so they can choose another "not Kamala Harris"...... IQ 75......
                Oh, just like the evidence to prove that the election was stolen? Lololololololol......

                Last minute evidence turns only work in movies and TV. If there was any real evidence, especially for however long it has been investigated, then why hasn't anyone com3 with that smoking gun, silver bullet, golden bb? Hate to tell you, but you are in the long con. Keep telling you that they have the evidence and it is only be, tomorrow, next week, or soon and you keep buying it.

                Comment

                • Pyrate Jim
                  Shi Tamajutsu Ka
                  • May 2002
                  • 1052

                  #353


                  Desperate times call for desperate measures. It's the last two paragraphs that may predict the future.
                  CT Co-ordinator, Paintball Marshals

                  Comment

                  • Pyrate Jim
                    Shi Tamajutsu Ka
                    • May 2002
                    • 1052

                    #354
                    Originally posted by Nobody
                    If there was any real evidence, especially for however long it has been investigated, then why hasn't anyone com3 with that smoking gun, silver bullet, golden bb? Hate to tell you, but you are in the long con. Keep telling you that they have the evidence and it is only be, tomorrow, next week, or soon and you keep buying it.
                    R.I.P. President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
                    CT Co-ordinator, Paintball Marshals

                    Comment

                    • Nobody
                      Nobody's Perfect
                      • Oct 2001
                      • 3384

                      #355
                      Originally posted by going_home
                      Here's a couple good questions for the prognosticators:

                      1] Who will be Trump's VP choice

                      2] Who will be the democrat presidential candidate
                      1) it's way to early to even say. There still has to be p4imaries, as if there are more than 1 candidate, they have to decide by that. Yes, with such a lead, he would be the presumptive choice, but a lot of things can happen before he tries to turn the office into a crown.

                      2) RFKJr, is running as an independent and I know no other potential candidates that have ponies up to throw their hat in the ring. While like above, it is still early, it is also a non-issue. Again lots of things can change between now and then, but the democratic party is going with the better alternative

                      3) VPs? You can say the gop is really auditioning for that but let's be real. None of those lovers will win thr job, as none of them have anything more to offer the ticket. The GOP VP nominee should be a vote getter where the presidential candidate lacks. Like in 2016, trump lacks any real credibility with the evangelical, so pence was tapped to shore up that. So, other than a possible parole officer, where doesn't the presumptive lack? Other than wanting to be a dictator, dictators don't really want someone who is "gunning" for the job.


                      A better question to ask is, who would you want to see the nomination go to, if trump is indisposed through judgments against him, i.e. awaiting sentencing?

                      Comment

                      • maniacmechanic
                        PrestonCoPaintball
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 3453

                        #356
                        Originally posted by going_home
                        Here's a couple good questions for the prognosticators:

                        1] Who will be Trump's VP choice

                        2] Who will be the democrat presidential candidate

                        Doesn't matter , when machines control the outcome

                        Comment

                        • Pyrate Jim
                          Shi Tamajutsu Ka
                          • May 2002
                          • 1052

                          #357
                          And who is charge of the machines?
                          I heard that in N. America, it just happens the Dominion division head is married to Roy Epps.
                          I could be wrong, msm never covered it so it's difficult to back up.
                          This is today...


                          13 Israelis, 10 Thais, and a Filipino. No Americans.
                          I've seen no sign that our administration is making any effort to have our own released, in the six weeks since, not through negotiations nor threats of bringing them out through direct action.
                          Whatever happened to the concepts of "Protect our own" and "No Man left behind"?

                          Look at the pro-Palestinian protests going on. I mean, blocking the Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade? What does that have to do with Israel?
                          It does point out one thing, while the President hasn't brought home any of the hostages, he has brought home the War.
                          CT Co-ordinator, Paintball Marshals

                          Comment

                          • Nobody
                            Nobody's Perfect
                            • Oct 2001
                            • 3384

                            #358
                            So much to unpack here... sigh

                            Originally posted by Pyrate Jim
                            And who is charge of the machines? bipartisan election boards
                            I heard that in N. America, it just happens the Dominion division head is married to Roy Epps.
                            I could be wrong, msm never covered it so it's difficult to back up. you are so very wrong and your attempt at sarcasm is dubious at best. As i am surr you have never watched a minute of anything close to liberal, and certainly not liberal news
                            This is today...
                            https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...aa6ddb0d&ei=49
                            Originally posted by Pyrate Jim
                            13 Israelis, 10 Thais, and a Filipino. No Americans. Let's look at the big picture of hostages being released versus why no American citizens. It really doesn't matter who is released first, just that they are released.
                            I've seen no sign that our administration is making any effort to have our own released, in the six weeks since, not through negotiations nor threats of bringing them out through direct action. as opposed to the constant trips back and forth to Israel from Blinken and other Admin personnel, the near daily updates from the state department and the mere fact that, while us citizens, they were taken in another sovereigncojntry, who is perpetuatinga war, and working through them, is the only way to do this. Going over the head of another country/government is no way on how to deal with a sensitive situation without an escalation of hostilities. Put simply, you don't go in, guns ablazin' and not expect things to get messy. This is one of the more moronic statementsyou'vemade.
                            Whatever happened to the concepts of "Protect our own" and "No Man left behind"? so you want a soldier with every citizen in a foreign country, or do we establish a pre-crime unit to stop all the bad things before they happen?
                            Originally posted by Pyrate Jim
                            Look at the pro-Palestinian protests going on. I mean, blocking the Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade? What does that have to do with Israel? people can protest anything they want. Just because you don't agree with it, doesn't mean that it is not warranted.
                            It does point out one thing, while the President hasn't brought home any of the hostages, he has brought home the War. I don't see any war happening in this country? Sure, go back 3-4 years where peolle were protesting and armed unnamed governmental agencies were artesting and detaining people without warrant, possiblyeven firing upon people. But no amount of bloodshed will do anything to release the hostages any faster than what is happening now. If you had a clue diplomacy, then you wouldn'tsay something as stupid as this.
                            I would want to blame the stupidity of the post on a turkey bender, cause the statements made are as smart as installing a screen door on a submarine.

                            Comment

                            • Pyrate Jim
                              Shi Tamajutsu Ka
                              • May 2002
                              • 1052

                              #359
                              There it is. The hyperbolic rhetoric I would expect from you.
                              I knew you couldn't resist the bait.

                              While I'm here, let me just cherry-pick one item:
                              people can protest anything they want. Just because you don't agree with it, doesn't mean that it is not warranted.
                              How is it warranted to glue yourself to the road in front of a parade that has been an American institution since 1924? Or to then deface an historic Public Library because they don't like the name?


                              "Protest" does not mean "Destroy and Disrupt". Well, unless you're throwing tea into Boston harbor, which has its own indication for the near future.
                              But "warranted"? That word is synonymous with "Justified".
                              I have read the words of a wise man that state "Violence is the refuge of the incompetent" which to me means that if you have to resort to tactics involving defacing and vandalizing public landmarks or pulling down statues that remind us of our heritage and where it comes from, then you're just too darn stupid to think of another way.
                              This negative behavior has been increasing, as has its acceptance while justified by people like yourself who claim violence is rational.

                              So yes, I do not condone the type of behavior you seem to consider warranted or justified.
                              CT Co-ordinator, Paintball Marshals

                              Comment

                              • Pyrate Jim
                                Shi Tamajutsu Ka
                                • May 2002
                                • 1052

                                #360
                                How long before we come to this?


                                If you cannot shut off the discussion, just restrict the ability to discuss.
                                CT Co-ordinator, Paintball Marshals

                                Comment

                                Working...