NVidia VS ATI

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TRIAD
    Registered User
    • Jun 2002
    • 889

    #16
    And the Shocker eats gas. It needs a HUGE tank, that doesn't mean it's a good thing. So, this card needs more power than is currently available to gcards, does that mean it's better? NO.
    Christian, and proud of it.

    My setup, built by Tunaman:

    http://www.automags.org/forums/showt...threadid=50949

    Good Traders: Tunaman, dnm5d, vf-xx, cphilip

    FOR SALE:
    One 'cocker barrel and a pre-2k APBBOLTS anti-chop bolt. PM for info.

    Comment

    • Tron
      Registered User
      • May 2002
      • 654

      #17
      Originally posted by Telefragged
      Ever considered a VisionTek GeForce, I've got on in my laptop and its got incredible rendering and framerate. Possible output is higher than an Nvidia or ATI. BTW, ATi = Problems, lots of them.
      VisionTek is just a brand and your laptop is running a GeForce4 GO card which doesn't even have a lot of the features a GeForce3 has. Although its stil a great card and awesome amount of power in a laptop. ATI is find for lowerend cards and people who cannot afford Nvidia. I put them in computers I sell if they don't want to pay to much or don't mind the speed loss.

      -Tron

      Comment

      • bigsarge72
        15yrsandstillgoingstrong
        • Jul 2002
        • 149

        #18
        Carmack has since changed his mind about the new ATI cards.

        sarge

        ps If I can find his exact quotes I'll add them in later
        When that eight foot tall goon is tapping the back of your favorite head against the wall, and asks, "Have you paid your dues?"...You tell him what old Jack Burton tells him...You tell him, "The checks in the mail".

        Comment

        Working...