Carson Palmer or Ken Dorsey

[boss_automager]

Carson Palmer won the Heisman but many think Dorsey was more deserving. I have to go with Dorsey. And who else do you think should have won?

[boss_automager]

does anyone want me to add any more people to the ballots?

[boss_automager]

someone speak!!!!!!!!

[Automaggin2]

neither. Ken Dorsey isnt that great, he justs has one hell of a offensive line., He has the best offensive line in the league. 2 linemen guys havnt allowed sacks all season. He has 11 interceptions the whole season, thats not very good compared to brad banks' 4. I say Brad Banks deserved the Heisman.

[Vash02]

Carson palmer had one heck of a season. Ken Dorseys team had a better record but i think carson had to perform much better to lead his team to victory.

[paintbattler]

dude..it was the biggest heisman uset...i wanted dorsey or banks to win

[Jonno06]

dorsey...definitly..

[boss_automager]

Originally posted by Jonno06
dorsey...definitly..

thats what i thought but we were wrong

i thought banks, mcgahhe,and dorsey had the best chances

[TigerMan]

Johnson should have won. He was most deserving of all. 2015 yards is amazing. Of the 5, I least expected Palmer to win, especially as lopsided as he did.

[spazzed]

/me laughs at all you people on the Dorsey bandwagon...

Pull your heads out of your bums and do some research for yourself... Dorsey may have on 33 straight, or whatever the hell it is, but as fas as individual stats go, he pales in comparison to the other candidates. The final tallies showed that...

When you look at it, Palmer had the best overall stats among the 5.... Not my choice, but I usually think the Heisman voting is a crock.

<---voted for Johnson.

[Collegeboy]

It either had to be Banks or Johnson IMO. Out of those I would of picked Johnson. But I do think alot of people where weary of the supposed westcoast bias, and tried to make it seem not so.

[ShooterJM]

I think the voters need to pull their head out. They have problems voting anyone but a senior the winner. Therefore, if you're only going to vote a senior, the heisman must stand for a college career of acheivment. Based on that Dorsey should have won hands down. There's a lot of backlash against him this year, but step back for a minute and count how many starters (especially on the O line) graduated last year. And come on.....look at palmer's first four years.... Based on the way people talked about you'd think Dorsey threw for 1200 yards, not over 3000.

[Rooster]

Ken who?


Banks should have won, no one on that list has made a bigger difference to their team. Palmer was a satisfactory second. At least no one from the PAC-10 can claim east-cost bias next year.

[ShooterJM]

Originally posted by Rooster
At least no one from the PAC-10 can claim east-cost bias next year.

True, at least that should shut em up.

[boss_automager]

it's Dorsey 6-2 over palmer so far

i looked at what Johnson did this year and noticed that he was more derserving than any.