All you math junkies...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Will Wood
    Evil Monkey
    • May 2002
    • 3475

    #1

    All you math junkies...

    Solve for X. It's all variables. (If you might have confused b for 6 or whatever.)

    I hate math (Kinda good at it though), but somehow I find my self trying to solve this now. Classmate came up to me with this problem.

    Look at the problem below.. my image was way too big.
    Last edited by Will Wood; 03-20-2003, 06:19 PM.
  • LittMag
    Litt Wang
    • Jul 2001
    • 872

    #2
    will really quickly I get
    x= sqroot((b^2r^2 + 2axc - c^2)/(b^2 - a^2))
    Great Traders - DiRTyBuNNy - midwikid - than205 - DropKick1 - jericoholics - personman - Siayajin - Remington - Jaymz
    My Feedback

    My For Sale and Wanted Thread

    Comment

    • Collegeboy

      #3
      You can check my math I don't think I made a mistake but I am good at simple mistakes so please check.
      Last edited by Guest; 03-20-2003, 12:20 PM.

      Comment

      • Collegeboy

        #4
        Here you go

        Comment

        • tobz
          I help lost people...
          • Dec 2002
          • 683

          #5
          umm

          yeah, the square root of (a^2 + b^2) is not (a + b)

          that would mean the square root of (3^2 + 6^2) = 9, when it actually is supposed to be the square root of (9+36) which = the square root of 45, which can further be simplified to 3*sqrt(5)

          I will solve this for you, give me a bit of time.

          T.J.
          Feedback - AO
          Feedback - PBN
          Feedback - eBay
          Paypal Verified Premier Member - 60+ Transactions
          Exceptionally Good Traders: FunkTheManMunky, MRAirgunRT
          Ask about my 3rd party trading services/prices

          Comment

          • Collegeboy

            #6
            Yes it is.

            Just think about it.

            Square root of a^2 is A. For it is saying the square of a times a, which is a.

            Comment

            • tobz
              I help lost people...
              • Dec 2002
              • 683

              #7
              right

              It's like a recursive description. I think he wants to try and SOLVE for x. Which means he wants an explicit definition. I have one done. Using the good ol' quadratic formula.
              .
              ...... this part means "plus or minus"
              .................. v | this entire part is underneath a radical sign |
              ......................... __________________________________
              ....... -2ac +/- v (2ac)^2 - 4(b^2 - a^2)((-b^2)(r^2)-c^2)
              .X = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
              ........................ 2(b^2 - a^2)
              .
              .
              The dots on the left are used just to align everything, please disregard them. The dashed line in the center is a division line. And all of the carrot marks "^" are powers. Meaning b^2 = b-squared. Let me know if you have any problems. Thanks!
              T.J.
              Last edited by tobz; 03-20-2003, 01:30 PM.
              Feedback - AO
              Feedback - PBN
              Feedback - eBay
              Paypal Verified Premier Member - 60+ Transactions
              Exceptionally Good Traders: FunkTheManMunky, MRAirgunRT
              Ask about my 3rd party trading services/prices

              Comment

              • tobz
                I help lost people...
                • Dec 2002
                • 683

                #8
                this might be clearer.. lol

                hopefully...

                -T.J.
                Feedback - AO
                Feedback - PBN
                Feedback - eBay
                Paypal Verified Premier Member - 60+ Transactions
                Exceptionally Good Traders: FunkTheManMunky, MRAirgunRT
                Ask about my 3rd party trading services/prices

                Comment

                • DaosBeoulve
                  VUSE
                  • Feb 2002
                  • 240

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Collegeboy
                  Yes it is.

                  Just think about it.

                  Square root of a^2 is A. For it is saying the square of a times a, which is a.

                  What tobz said.

                  If you square (a+b), you do not get (a^2+b^2), you get (a^2+2ab+b^2), simply because squaring (a+b) implies (a+b)(a+b).

                  Tobz, I have one question about your answer. Original problem said x=(that square root I don't feel like typing all out)

                  I agree with your quadratic answer, when you simplify out the right side, but did you factor in the left?

                  My brain refuses to work right now to work through all the algebra, and mathematica kicked me when I tried to get it to solve it for me=)
                  Don't think of it as being outnumbered, think of it as a wide target selection.

                  Comment

                  • tobz
                    I help lost people...
                    • Dec 2002
                    • 683

                    #10
                    yup!

                    I started by squaring both sides and that is where the X^2 term comes from. You also get another X^2 term by multiplying out what is under the radical, which is how I ended up with "(a^2 + b^2)x^2" I just factored the X^2 out and then a^2 + b^2 ends up as the coeff. Which I used in the quadratic formula as "a". Thanks for asking, because you remined me, when I squared both sides, some incorrect or imaginary roots may come up Make sure you double check your solution

                    Thanks.
                    T.J.
                    Feedback - AO
                    Feedback - PBN
                    Feedback - eBay
                    Paypal Verified Premier Member - 60+ Transactions
                    Exceptionally Good Traders: FunkTheManMunky, MRAirgunRT
                    Ask about my 3rd party trading services/prices

                    Comment

                    • -=Squid=-

                      #11
                      Technically isnt it already solved since X is alone on one side? Im 99% its a trick question...

                      Comment

                      • tobz
                        I help lost people...
                        • Dec 2002
                        • 683

                        #12
                        umm..

                        I just solved it. backup my work if you'd like, in fact I'd appreciate it. If I find a scanner I'll scan my paper in, but I'm NOT writing all my work in paint lol

                        X is solved for, but as you can see X is on the right side as well. Which means that it is implicity defined, but what I did was Explicitly Define it. That way x is NOT dependent upon x on the right side. It was only solved for using a slight recursive or implicit definition, and now I just solved it so it was explicit.

                        Thanks.
                        T.J.
                        Feedback - AO
                        Feedback - PBN
                        Feedback - eBay
                        Paypal Verified Premier Member - 60+ Transactions
                        Exceptionally Good Traders: FunkTheManMunky, MRAirgunRT
                        Ask about my 3rd party trading services/prices

                        Comment

                        • -=Squid=-

                          #13
                          Whoops, I didnt realise it was on both sides....my mistake, sorry about that...ignore my ignorance

                          Comment

                          Working...