Global summit studies placing Internet under U.N. control

[1stdeadeye]

Originally posted by impostal22
In 1995, California-based UNOCAL proposed the construction of an oil pipeline from Turkmenistan, south through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the Arabian Sea. Yasushi Akashi, U.N. Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs, was critical of "outside interference in Afghanistan" in 1997, which, he said, "is now all related to the battle for oil and gas pipelines. The fear is that these companies and regional powers are just renting the Taliban for their own purposes."

So a proposed pipeline from almost 9 years ago is your smoking gun?

Timely aren't we!

[Indigo]

LMFAO....The UN in my opinion is a joke giving them control over the internet would not be a very wise move doing that would be like giving a loaded gun to a five year old.Here is a couple of links what the UN recently did.

UN rules Canada should ban spanking
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=35000

UN trying to ban personal ownership of guns including the US
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=33584

[impostal22]

Originally posted by 1stdeadeye


So a proposed pipeline from almost 9 years ago is your smoking gun?

Timely aren't we!

whoa..i'm so stuck in the 90s..i keep thinking 1995 was like 5 years ago...it's so weird...i'm really stuck at the century turn over...but STILL...lol...ok ok *goes back to researcH*

[p8ntball1016]

Originally posted by Indigo
LMFAO....The UN in my opinion is a joke giving them control over the internet would not be a very wise move doing that would be like giving a loaded gun to a five year old.Here is a couple of links what the UN recently did.

UN rules Canada should ban spanking
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=35000

UN trying to ban personal ownership of guns including the US
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=33584

Next time could you PLEASE not use a source as biased as that page?

[FactsOfLife]

Originally posted by p8ntball1016
Next time could you PLEASE not use a source as biased as that page?

why? does it invalidate the basic facts of the story? No, it does not.

[MaChu]

OMG that is freaking hilarious. Spanking? BUWAHAHAHHAAHA! What next? They gonna say that must use the "Time Out" method or what? UN Peacekeeper forces are going to come and arrest me? LOL!

[impostal22]

Originally posted by FactsOfLife


why? does it invalidate the basic facts of the story? No, it does not.

yet bias seems to invalidate the basic facts of every source i've posted. interesting how this works..

[1stdeadeye]

Originally posted by impostal22


yet bias seems to invalidate the basic facts of every source i've posted. interesting how this works..

No, just your almost a decade old sources!

Wait, now we can slam Clinton as a puppet of big oil!

[Lohman446]

Originally posted by MaChu
OMG that is freaking hilarious. Spanking? BUWAHAHAHHAAHA! What next? They gonna say that must use the "Time Out" method or what? UN Peacekeeper forces are going to come and arrest me? LOL!

Nah, there gonna watch you and whine about it, as long as you do not directly spank them they cannot use there arms or armor to interfere.

[impostal22]

Originally posted by 1stdeadeye


No, just your almost a decade old sources!

Wait, now we can slam Clinton as a puppet of big oil!

lol i wasn't referring to you 1stdeadeye..i admitted that 9 year old documents don't help my case at all.

[1stdeadeye]

Originally posted by impostal22


lol i wasn't referring to you 1stdeadeye..i admitted that 9 year old documents don't help my case at all.

But your article proves that Clinton was a puppet of big oil, so I like it!

[impostal22]

Originally posted by 1stdeadeye


But your article proves that Clinton was a puppet of big oil, so I like it!

lol so it does...