Sp ripping off yet another idea

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bornl33t
    hello lamewads
    • Oct 2000
    • 4463

    #1

    Sp ripping off yet another idea

    Short term financing makes it possible to acquire highly sought-after domains without the strain of upfront costs. Find your domain name today.


    the pepsi bottle down the page. I was doing that in 1999 and 2000 AND I got it from a 1997 issue of APG.

    According the the article the shocker is a revolutionary design... only problem is it's been around since the matrix. So it's not THAT revolutionary. Bunch a smiling cock bites.
  • FlameboyC11
    Registered User
    • Feb 2004
    • 96

    #2
    I think you're a little behind in the times. First off, that page is a little over a year old. Second, SP isn't selling the pepsi bottle cover, they are selling the things on the end of the tank. The pepsi bottle logo is just there to show that they are clear in the middle. Also, the shocker is a brand new idea. It's a single tube design using a valve in a way never used before. I'd call that revolutionary. I don't like SP, but slandering them for no reason is stupid.

    Comment

    • Butterfingers
      PhD in Automagology
      • Jan 2001
      • 2263

      #3
      Originally posted by FlameboyC11
      I think you're a little behind in the times. First off, that page is a little over a year old. Second, SP isn't selling the pepsi bottle cover, they are selling the things on the end of the tank. The pepsi bottle logo is just there to show that they are clear in the middle. Also, the shocker is a brand new idea. It's a single tube design using a valve in a way never used before. I'd call that revolutionary. I don't like SP, but slandering them for no reason is stupid.
      The shocker and the matrix use the same operating design.... a spool valve. Its nothing special they copied it from dye. They even managed to screw it up and make a bolt that leaks down the barrel and wastes air at the end of the stroke
      Did you hear about the new european weapons contracts? France is going to make the wooden sticks Spain making the little white flags

      Comment

      • FlameboyC11
        Registered User
        • Feb 2004
        • 96

        #4
        Didn't copy, licenced it. It is different since it is a single tube design.

        Comment

        • Butterfingers
          PhD in Automagology
          • Jan 2001
          • 2263

          #5
          Originally posted by FlameboyC11
          Didn't copy, licenced it. It is different since it is a single tube design.
          Nope...

          The matrix is a single tube with lots of extra metal.

          Only dye did it right notice how the air supply closes before firing.... Still isnt original.



          The DM4 also includes an LPR so that the solnoids actually run at its designed pressures.

          I could go on and on about how SP screwed up a copied design that they "liscenced" but that would take all day.
          Did you hear about the new european weapons contracts? France is going to make the wooden sticks Spain making the little white flags

          Comment

          • FalconGuy016
            Divine Right, Pevs @ AG
            • Aug 2002
            • 6127

            #6
            Alright, they are allowed to use a certain design for their paintball gun. Thats like saying chevy copied ford for the inline 6 design
            Hey
            AIM: FalconGuy016
            BANG!!!

            Comment

            • Heat
              hello lamewads
              • Oct 2000
              • 4463

              #7
              Originally posted by FalconGuy016
              Alright, they are allowed to use a certain design for their paintball gun. Thats like saying chevy copied ford for the inline 6 design
              well ford WAS first...so in theory everyone that make a combustion engine is copy'ing Ford.

              And that is exactly why I hate SP. Does anyone seriously believe they invented the "electro pneumatic gun"? And if so... it's a common element to paintball. That's like Henry ford saying well I'm going to changed my patent now re-instating the patent in it's entirety putting GM, the import market, john deere, Craftsman, snapper, .. EVERYONE out of buisness. NOW do you see why we hate SP? Greedy two timing bastards. They are just jealous their penises are so small.

              Comment

              • Ultimator
                ASsDddddddddddF
                • Apr 2002
                • 1389

                #8
                Warning for flaming - cphilip. I really hope you don't think SP saw your tank and copied it from you.
                Last edited by cphilip; 06-13-2004, 09:03 PM.
                The only difference between martyrdom and suicide is press coverage.

                Comment

                • 1stdeadeye
                  Still around????
                  • Jun 2002
                  • 8501

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Heat
                  well ford WAS first...so in theory everyone that make a combustion engine is copy'ing Ford.

                  And that is exactly why I hate SP. Does anyone seriously believe they invented the "electro pneumatic gun"? And if so... it's a common element to paintball. That's like Henry ford saying well I'm going to changed my patent now re-instating the patent in it's entirety putting GM, the import market, john deere, Craftsman, snapper, .. EVERYONE out of buisness. NOW do you see why we hate SP? Greedy two timing bastards. They are just jealous their penises are so small.
                  Uhm nice argument, but wrong facts. Ford did not invent the Internal Combustion Engine. He did invent Charcoal though! Ford was the father of industrial mass production lines.

                  Comment

                  • Gadget
                    UK Redskins
                    • Jun 2002
                    • 472

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Heat
                    well ford WAS first...so in theory everyone that make a combustion engine is copy'ing Ford.
                    Erm, Ford was by no means the first person to produce either a) an internal combustion engine, or b) a car.

                    Just thought I'd point that out.....now back to the SP hating


                    EDIT: ooh scooped by 1stDeadeye while typing
                    sigpic
                    My Feedback

                    Comment

                    • bleachit
                      Conturbo et Ledo
                      • May 2003
                      • 1410

                      #11
                      wasn't the spool valve first used in the Nova line of markers? Making the matrix and shocker based on "old" technology? I understand that the nova's do not operate the same way as the shocker or matrix, as the nova did not have a bolt, but still, spool valves in paintball have been around for a while.
                      "Great stories! See everyone, just buy a Sydarm and become a paintball superstar!! "
                      AGD

                      "i just sent out the full force of the canadian army (4 guys). expect high canadian casualties"
                      Blackweenie

                      Comment

                      • WenULiVeUdiE
                        Force of Nature Staff
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 1982

                        #12
                        The internal combustion engine was invented by Nikolaus Otto in the 1870's. Mr. Ford just revolutionized how we made cars, the assembly line.

                        About the Nova and spool valve, I'd also like to know.
                        Hey, look at that! It's Santa!

                        Comment

                        • Heat
                          hello lamewads
                          • Oct 2000
                          • 4463

                          #13
                          btw that's is exactly what I was getting at... ford didn't make the combustion engine and SP didn't make the electro guns.

                          Comment

                          • MarkM
                            UK Cougars
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 2433

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Heat
                            http://www.pballcanada.com/news.html

                            the pepsi bottle down the page. I was doing that in 1999 and 2000 AND I got it from a 1997 issue of APG.

                            According the the article the shocker is a revolutionary design... only problem is it's been around since the matrix. So it's not THAT revolutionary. Bunch a smiling cock bites.
                            The bottle cover thing is a little old in so far as news is concerned however the product is NOT Smart Parts they are just the distributors for it, the item itself was shown at the World Cup in October 2002 by the makers and obviously Smart Parts cut a deal to become exclusive distributors, nothing wrong with that.
                            Mark UK Cougars


                            UK Cougars
                            Sterling Owners Group. Member #39

                            Comment

                            • dwab3000
                              im not wearing any pants
                              • Mar 2004
                              • 1072

                              #15
                              The internal combustion engine was invented by Nikolaus Otto in the 1870's. Mr. Ford just revolutionized how we made cars, the assembly line.
                              im not gonna say im right but i beliebve you are mistaken....gotfried datmier or something like that dont remember....
                              HalloWicked
                              HATCHET WARRIORS UNITE
                              Clown Love

                              Comment

                              Working...