AMD equivalent processor info needed ....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lopxtc
    Unix Geek
    • Oct 2001
    • 2706

    #1

    AMD equivalent processor info needed ....

    Hey all ...

    Okay I have been an Intel person from day one .. but looking to upgrade my current system, and thought about giving AMD a look-over (mostly since they seem to be cheaper $$$ wise).

    I am looking to move to a P4 2.8 - 3.0 system and wanted to know what the equivalent AMD cpu would be.

    Being mostly a Unix person myself I typically deal in Sparc (Solaris), and Xeon (Linux) processors so I havent kept up with home class CPU's in awhile. My current machine is a dual pentium III xeon 866 ... good for work and such, but not so good for games.

    Aaron
    Team Managed Aggression, Missouri Paintball

    Pround owner of a 2003 Shocker, and AO.org user ... an almost unheard of combo.

    "Love, Peace, and Shonen Knife!"
    AOLIM - lopxtc
  • Python14
    Norsk
    • Jun 2001
    • 3343

    #2
    XP 2800-3000 are the rough equivelents. Same goes for the 64 series.
    BLOODY MURDER!

    Comment

    • Deltree
      ph33r
      • Aug 2004
      • 128

      #3
      yeah the amd athlon 64 3000+ is actually only 2.0 ghz but it runs games better than a pentium running at 3.0 ghz. its cheaper too

      Comment

      • Ironmag
        Support the troops
        • Sep 2002
        • 411

        #4
        It's all about AMD for me ever since the first Athlons came out many years ago. My next PC is gonna be a custom build with the 64 chips hopefully by the end of the year.

        Comment

        • Can_Opener
          UW-Madison Paintball
          • Apr 2002
          • 195

          #5
          The AMD 3000+ and 3200+ would be the closest competitors to the p4 3.0 ghz processors. A friend of mine has a 3.0 ghz system with 1024 mb of pc3200 and a radeon 9800 pro 256 mb, and I have an athlon xp 2500+ overclocked to 3200+ speeds, 512 mb of PC3200 and a radeon 9800 pro 128 mb, and we benchmark nearly the same in 3dmark 03, within a few hundred points.

          Maybe someone can PM me why my sig was tampered
          with when my image is below 20 kb and was 350x159.(20435 bytes/1024 bytes per kb = 19.96 kb.)

          Comment

          • Python14
            Norsk
            • Jun 2001
            • 3343

            #6
            Yea, I more or less have the same setup as you canopener, and It's beautiful.
            BLOODY MURDER!

            Comment

            Working...