ok..WTF..Mods.

[Maksimus54]

IN before the lock.

But really, perhaps you should pm or email the mods asking why your sig was shot down. While I agree the issue needs to be addressed, perhaps in a public place, where you could keep your temper and not get banned

[Flow_Tech]

see,its not even about getting banned,i dont give a **** if i did get banned..i want everyone to see that my sig was anhilated for no reason and that the mod who did it is power hungry and abuses his moddage.

[Cryer]

back from the dead to see this guy go down

[Flow_Tech]

i havent "gone down" by now,so i dont think i will.and if i do,i dont care at this point.

[Blennidae]

Flow_tech:

I'm not a big fan of the way the mods have been behaving in the past few days, but your post is exactly what they need for their arguement.

Best case scenario, they find you were right about your sig, and re-instate it. Your envoking the swear filter kills it for you and you get banned anyway.

If you don't care about getting banned, why do you even care about the sig?

Maybe take a step back, allow yourself to cool off and wait for a reply about your sig before going ballistic. If you don't hear from them in a day, maybe then you can say they are avoiding you, but give them a chance to look into it.

[Flow_Tech]

Flow_tech:

I'm not a big fan of the way the mods have been behaving in the past few days, but your post is exactly what they need for their arguement.

Best case scenario, they find you were right about your sig, and re-instate it. Your envoking the swear filter kills it for you and you get banned anyway.

If you don't care about getting banned, why do you even care about the sig?

Maybe take a step back, allow yourself to cool off and wait for a reply about your sig before going ballistic. If you don't hear from them in a day, maybe then you can say they are avoiding you, but give them a chance to look into it.

finally..a logicall response..but anyways...i care about the sig because it was removed for no reason,i had checked 2 times to see if it was in the guidelines inwhich it was...and i know for a fact that i was avoided because this is the 2nd time this has happened and the first time i PMed the Mods asking why,and i have no reply.

[AO Moderation Team]

Ok the signature was removed because it was over the size allowed pure and simple, also it was the second time the same signature had been removed.
Attached is signature image and no editting has been done to increase the size.

Also due to the use of cussing to attempt to get your point across of course Flow_tech you are now on a 3 day ban.

[GT]

back from the dead to see this guy go down

wtf?

where have you been? I have had to pw for the both of us over the last year.

[thecavemankevin]

images must be kept under 20k, your = 25k. get it now?

[Skywalker]

images must be kept under 20k, your = 25k. get it now?

Wait a minute, you sig image is bigger. What am I missing here?

[Chronobreak]

Wait a minute, you sig image is bigger. What am I missing here?

i the the problem is people varying sizes....cant there just be a mod to the forum to not allow "total" sig under a certain size to limit problems?

ALOT of people are in sig violations..EVEN me for having one 22k
some people also seem to have sigs that are longer but shorter or taller but skinner....but stil under the total diameters....

another problem is the mods seem to be trying TOO hard to do things in some cases...
i liked it better when they were kinda behind the curtain more.


another problem il relate too sigs almsot never being tampered with because of the rules used to be more of actual "guidleines" of suggested limits. Now the "guidlines" are "rules"

btw in all fairnes his sig was in violation.....he shouldve pmd a mod or dealt with this issue elsewhere.

P.S. HAHA @ mike

[WickeDKlowN]

Wait a minute, you sig image is bigger. What am I missing here?

His(kevins) is 220x175 @ 15k, nothing wrong with it.

[AO Moderation Team]

i the the problem is people varying sizes....cant there just be a mod to the forum to not allow "total" sig under a certain size to limit problems?

ALOT of people are in sig violations..EVEN me for having one 22k
some people also seem to have sigs that are longer but shorter or taller but skinner....but stil under the total diameters....

another problem is the mods seem to be trying TOO hard to do things in some cases...
i liked it better when they were kinda behind the curtain more.


another problem il relate too sigs almsot never being tampered with because of the rules used to be more of actual "guidleines" of suggested limits. Now the "guidlines" are "rules"

btw in all fairnes his sig was in violation.....he shouldve pmd a mod or dealt with this issue elsewhere.

P.S. HAHA @ mike

The signature was over the limits set in the Guidelines. Yes it does say Guidlines but that is meant as what you can or cannot do as a guide otherwise it would read that ALL signatures are to be a set size only. In some respects that is in place with the dimensions given BUT it also clearly states that 20k is the upper file limit so that is a RULE.
As for looking for issues, very often signatures are reported as being oversize others are come across in the normal way by the reading of a thread.
In this case the signature had already been removed once so that should have been the first clue something was wrong with the signature, as a quick reading of the link contained within the "new" signature pic would have shown.
As you have now seen the signatures are saved so should a comment be made the evidence is there to be produced. Of course the way in which to deal with this was not to start a thread together with losing it online and now that price has been paid.

[thecavemankevin]

Wait a minute, you sig image is bigger. What am I missing here?

um, since when?

[ColdFuzion]

Right before his execution! Lemme get out my graphic... (This one may get me banned... :shifty:)



-AND-

(This is what will happen to him)



-Cold

**EDIT** I did not see the Mod had struck...