go mike!!!!
-
-
Once again: What proof do you have that the DA didn't?Originally posted by FreakBaller12He's a legal pedophile now
Comment
-
Originally posted by SlartyBartFastWhy wow?
What do you know that the Jury doesn't? What insight or evidence do you have that the prosecution didn't have?
After gunning for the guy for years, the prosecution falls on the compliaints and testimony of a family that was obviously out to scam money from celebrities and whose every story was difficult to believe....
Sure, the guy is bizarre. But if the DA can't prove their case after all these years of trying, perhaps he truly is guilty of nothing more than being strange.
I didn't mean it like that, I meant like wow I thought he was gonna be guilty on at least one thing. Just surprised, not disagreeing.
My feedback thread
AIM-bertmcmahan
My email:[email protected]
Good traders: richie,Roguefactor,moufo48,845,brtncstm160,vf-xx
Mags don't shoot darts... they shoot nails.
I used to be bertmcmahan, that I did.Comment
-
Boo yarz, Michael Jackson > life.Comment
-
this feels like the OJ trial.My Guns: chrome and black pump mag
-black 2k sniper 2
-32* vision imp with ups, ECS, reloader B
-was'd imp w/ i-frame and all ups, warp feed
-88/3000 and 48/3000 tanks
AIM: Paintball1084
my feedbackComment
-
quoted in agreementOriginally posted by -=Squid=-Comment
-
A not guilty verdict is NOT the same thing as actual innocense. OJ was GUILTY as heck, and he got off.Comment
-
I thought this whole thing was B.S. from the beginning. I mean come on. The kid was 13 at the time. I remember when I was 13. There is no way a dude could molest me being that old. Even If I were 10 or 8 just seems rediculous. I dont care how much alcohol you give me I aint gonna let no wierdo molest me at 13.
Comment
Ehh seemed like from the beginning that he was gonna get off inncoent atleast that has been my oppinion, plus from what my uncle who is a criminal attorney told me apparently the DA messed up alot. So all in all this verdict dosetn suprise me at all.
Ryan
mcveighr--You think caffeine rocks you should try cocaine.Comment
I was JKing, jeez. Lighten upOriginally posted by SlartyBartFastOnce again: What proof do you have that the DA didn't?
I knew not what I did but am now edumacatedComment
Inocent until proven guilty....beyond a shadow of a doubt. The people that testified against him shouldn't have even been used in the case because their testimony was/is worthless.
You all remember the boy that cried wolf I'm sure?
Either way, I could case less about jacko. I don't have an opinon one way or the other, I just wish the news would move on and report on something else.Comment
This case was all about color......Green!
Money gets you off. Ask OJ, Baretta, now Michael..Comment
I think it's BS.
I can imagine the deliberations...
"If we do what's right and convict him, we're sure to get death threats and all manner of disagreeable things. We better let him go!"
If he's such an innocent guy, why did he settle for, what, $30 million the first time this happend? Yeah, tossing 30 mil to keep an accuser quiet and out of court is something an innocent "man" would do.
Goddamn pedophile bastards. I hope he burns in Hell.
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." --Henry Louis Mencken.Comment
If you had any doubt that the current legal system isnt jacked up...I give you the jacko verdict.
what a joke"The Few Who Do Are The Envy Of The Many Who Only Stand And Watch"
Alway Remember *343*
Si vis pacem, para bellumComment
er... what if he actually is innocent?Comment
Comment