Angels just lost

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kosmo
    KaPTaiN KeNNy
    • Dec 2000
    • 1642

    #1

    Angels just lost

    That means that NY, Boston, and LA, three of the biggest stupidest and most accountable for the ruining of baseball, have been smited. HAH! If only the Indians wouldve made the playoffs and kept one of those three from reaching, it wouldve been even better. Youd have to think though, that what with spending craploads of money like they do, and getting beaten by a team that didnt, that the money teams would be the ones most in favor of a salary cap so they could have an excuse to lose and not have to spend all that money doing it.
    Kosmo For President '08, '12, '16... However long it takes
  • SocialD
    ^ wanders around aimlessly
    • Jan 2003
    • 229

    #2
    Woohoo!!!! GO Sox.

    Added:

    When the Sox-Angels series started I was really worried. I watched the Angels hand it to the Sox all season. So, I was pleasantly suprised when they pulled it off in 5 games.

    I thought that we were going to lose it in 5 instead.
    Last edited by SocialD; 10-16-2005, 10:53 PM.
    I'm a lefty that plays with an old school RT with H/L. I bought a warp and all is right with the world.
    SocialD's feedback
    SocialD's stuff for sale
    Jaz Air Technologies barrels

    Comment

    • Vex
      Superiorly Inferior
      • Jun 2001
      • 1871

      #3
      Damn...

      Oh well, maybe it'll be another "Sox" year...that would be kind of cool.
      "Otaeri wa doko desu ka?"
      ------------
      --Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
      ------------
      Think you're ready, Grasshopper?
      www.ohioshaolin.com

      Comment

      • lather
        Registered User
        • Jul 2004
        • 591

        #4
        Not having a New York, Boston or LA team means poor ratings for this years World Series. A regular season Yankees-Red Sox game would probably have higher ratings.

        "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin

        My Feedback

        Comment

        • Lohman446
          Useful posts: 7
          • Jun 2003
          • 9315

          #5
          Originally posted by lather
          Not having a New York, Boston or LA team means poor ratings for this years World Series. A regular season Yankees-Red Sox game would probably have higher ratings.


          I don't think so. Even Yankee fans can appreciate two long shot teams (assuming Clemens err. I mean the Astros) make it too.

          I'm a Yankees fan and would have cheered for them had they made it, or cheered against Boston if they made it. I am as interested in this series as if they were there, and pulling for Clemens to win one.
          Last edited by Lohman446; 10-17-2005, 07:25 AM.
          "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

          Comment

          • Aggressive Rooster
            Registered User
            • Dec 2003
            • 37

            #6
            Originally posted by lather
            Not having a New York, Boston or LA team means poor ratings for this years World Series. A regular season Yankees-Red Sox game would probably have higher ratings.

            who wouldnt watch the world series just because there team didnt make it?im a cards fan and if they dont win three straight ill definately watch the ws and be rooting for the white sox.i quess its about being a baseball fan and not just a fan of your city.

            Comment

            • lather
              Registered User
              • Jul 2004
              • 591

              #7
              Originally posted by Lohman446
              I don't think so. Even Yankee fans can appreciate two long shot teams (assuming Clemens err. I mean the Astros) make it too.

              I'm a Yankees fan and would have cheered for them had they made it, or cheered against Boston if they made it. I am as interested in this series as if they were there, and pulling for Clemens to win one.

              Teams like Yankees/Red Sox have a larger fan base outside of their major market area than a team such as the CWS. Outside of the primary market Im willing to bet there are more Yankee fans/ haters in any other region of the country than say a team like Saint Louis. Ratings will suffer because the casual fans favorite team to love (or hate) is not in the World Series.
              "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin

              My Feedback

              Comment

              • RoadDawg
                Degeneration X is back
                • May 2001
                • 4023

                #8
                I was at Game 5 last night... and man was it disappointing to watch a team that hit over .300 all season bat .175 as a team, plus watch 4 sox pitchers throw complete games, and have a MVP caliber player go 1-20 with 14 f'in ground outs.

                I'm most upset over the Yankee pitcher that tagged Bengie Molina in the elbow and ruined his ability to swing the freakin bat.

                As for the series I'm pulling for the Astro's because Chicago needs to keep the curse of the Cubs and WhiSox.

                EDIT:

                The umpires didn't help matters on two occasions(g2 & g4) but made the right call in game 5.
                Last edited by RoadDawg; 10-17-2005, 10:24 PM.
                Sorry, I'm old

                Comment

                • RingOfScale
                  Americanized Thai Pancake
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 898

                  #9
                  outside of that call with mr. zinsky at the ball possibly being in the dirt and a stolen first base, none of the calls effected the game outcomes. (and even so the sox still coulda won that one in extra innings.) so you cant really totally blame the umps.

                  it is rather impressive tho that out of a total of 45 innings that 44.3 were thrown by starting pictures tho...

                  -rIng
                  <<90 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot>>

                  Comment

                  • RoadDawg
                    Degeneration X is back
                    • May 2001
                    • 4023

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RingOfScale
                    outside of that call with mr. zinsky at the ball possibly being in the dirt and a stolen first base, none of the calls effected the game outcomes. (and even so the sox still coulda won that one in extra innings.) so you cant really totally blame the umps.

                    it is rather impressive tho that out of a total of 45 innings that 44.3 were thrown by starting pictures tho...

                    -rIng
                    I'm not saying the outcome would have been any different but either way the Angels were cheated out of at least one at bat. For example, game #4, Finley hits into a double play after hitting the catcher mit (catcher interference). Had it been called it would have been bases loaded with 1 out. Which could have sparked some emotion into the Angels, or Kennedy would have struck out or hit into a double play. Or he puts it over the fence and the they get 4 runs. Hard to say cause it didn't come to be.

                    Game #2. Ball wasn't in the dirt and and should have been the third out. Gives the angels 3 more chances to score, or get out. Either way I think the Sox would've won that game and all the other games due to the Angels hitting very crappy the whole series.
                    Sorry, I'm old

                    Comment

                    Working...