Jeffrey won!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lenny
    I AM the AO famous!
    • Dec 2003
    • 1628

    #1

    Jeffrey won!

    Anyone else watch Project Runway?

    Jeffrey won! He was my favorite, so I'm exited.
    Autocockers are the greatest markers ever made.
    ~The greatest BACKUP markers to AUTOMAGS!!

    Only temporary, get'n a new sig soon.
  • robnix
    email robnix@gmail
    • Jan 2006
    • 2094

    #2
    Originally posted by Lenny
    Anyone else watch Project Runway?

    Jeffrey won! He was my favorite, so I'm exited.
    He must have been ramping. With his skill level there's no other way he could have won.

    Comment

    • MicroMiniMe
      Easy Like Sunday Morning
      • May 2003
      • 1213

      #3
      Me and the wife thought it was going to be Uri.
      I think Uri and Michael will have no trouble getting a bump up from the show.

      CNC Emag
      Featherlight Viking

      Comment

      • warbeak2099
        That is my foot!
        • Jan 2004
        • 4447

        #4
        I don't watch the show but my girlfriend is very upset. I don't know why, was there something wrong with this guy or something?
        My Feedback

        Comment

        • thecavemankevin
          the living un-banned
          • Feb 2001
          • 4346

          #5
          wow, didnt know there were this many chicks and homo's on AO


          Quote: MarkM
          "virus attacks have been dealt with, same with back door nasties. ."

          My feed back

          Comment

          • FlawleZ
            Xmodded Karta Emag=sold ;(
            • May 2004
            • 824

            #6
            What is Project Runway?

            Sounds like a fashion model contest or something. Another reality show?

            -Splashed Automag RT
            My AO Feedback
            My Ebay Feedback

            Comment

            • Pneumagger
              I like 'Mags.

              • Jun 2006
              • 3556

              #7
              Lenny! Shhhh.

              Comment

              • tropical_fishy
                KART
                • Oct 2004
                • 1017

                #8
                Originally posted by thecavemankevin
                wow, didnt know there were this many chicks and homo's on AO

                Behave. No need for that. And if you're going to insult a group, at least spell it correctly.

                Comment

                • thecavemankevin
                  the living un-banned
                  • Feb 2001
                  • 4346

                  #9


                  Quote: MarkM
                  "virus attacks have been dealt with, same with back door nasties. ."

                  My feed back

                  Comment

                  • SCpoloRicker
                    HA HA I'm custom!!1
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 4375

                    #10
                    Originally posted by robnix
                    He must have been ramping. With his skill level there's no other way he could have won.
                    *applauds*

                    /oh noes teh gheys!!1
                    God....I guess I was probably returning videotapes.

                    Comment

                    • Pneumagger
                      I like 'Mags.

                      • Jun 2006
                      • 3556

                      #11
                      apologies not needed... quite the contrary actually

                      Originally posted by thecavemankevin
                      wow, didnt know there were this many chicks and homo's on AO
                      Originally posted by tropical fishy
                      Behave. No need for that. And if you're going to insult a group, at least spell it correctly.
                      homo's is correct. The apostraphe (sp?) replaces the substituted letters "sexual".
                      Kind of like in the word "hasn't" where the apostraphe replaces "o" of "has not".

                      By my standards (the standards)... homo's is used correctly. Unless he was trying to imply ownership of one homo, which he was not.

                      Comment

                      • Muzikman
                        Everything AGD
                        • Dec 2000
                        • 6229

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Pneumagger
                        homo's is correct. The apostraphe (sp?) replaces the substituted letters "sexual".
                        Kind of like in the word "hasn't" where the apostraphe replaces "o" of "has not".

                        By my standards (the standards)... homo's is used correctly. Unless he was trying to imply ownership of one homo, which he was not.
                        For the WIN!

                        Comment

                        • tropical_fishy
                          KART
                          • Oct 2004
                          • 1017

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Pneumagger
                          homo's is correct. The apostraphe (sp?) replaces the substituted letters "sexual".
                          Kind of like in the word "hasn't" where the apostraphe replaces "o" of "has not".

                          By my standards (the standards)... homo's is used correctly. Unless he was trying to imply ownership of one homo, which he was not.

                          I was actually more implying that "homo's" should not be used at all, since it's an unnecessary bastardization of the English language .

                          Comment

                          • Altimas
                            Registered User
                            • Feb 2004
                            • 909

                            #14
                            Are you saying all homos are bastards as well?
                            "If we aren't supposed to eat animals...why did God invent BBQ sauce?" - Army
                            AO Feedback

                            Comment

                            • warbeak2099
                              That is my foot!
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 4447

                              #15
                              Originally posted by tropical_fishy
                              I was actually more implying that "homo's" should not be used at all, since it's an unnecessary bastardization of the English language .
                              I wasn't aware that abbreviations were now unnaceptable in the English language. If you mean the word's negative connotations, well almost every expression in English is offensive to someone. For example, ever used or heard the word "maverick"? The etymology comes from the practice of branding cattle, a topic that would be horrifying to a Hindu or any culture that venerates cows. Ever used the word "chow" in place of "food"? That comes from mocking Chinese people in California during the 1850's. I'm still going to use it whenever I want though. The list goes on. If we all subscribed to political correctness, we would have no flavor or expressions in our language. Every language has the same things. Expressions and slang that are used on a daily basis without ever giving thought to their real meaning.
                              My Feedback

                              Comment

                              Working...