retro valve question

[Tk]

should i get a retro valve? i only shoot around 7-10 bps so is it worth my while to buy one?

[FrAuStY]

It's up to you... if you already shoot that fast, and you want to shoot faster then I'd get the Retro, the bounce in the trigger helps to achieve a lil higher ROF. Also.. butterfingers has a Retro-mini than can outshoot some electros. I'm pondering the same thing you are.. to Retro or Not to retro!

[Bartleby]

The only reasons to get it are the reactive trigger and an slight increase in consistency. I, personally, am not going to get one because 1) i don't shoot that fast and have no asperations to, and 2) I already shoot +/-2 fps.

If you're looking to achieve higher rates of fire and you can't do it without the reactive trigger, then maybe you should consider it. The best thing to do is take a few shots on someone else's retromag and see how you like it.

[rikkter]

i played with two guns that had the retro in it..and tell you the truth i never really could feel a bounce in the trigger..there was a LITTLE one but not what i was expecting.

[MrMag]

to actually get the trigger to become reactive, u need to have an input pressure between 750-850. also u need to be able to shoot fast enough to even get it to be reactive.

i would say go for it! i like mine a lot

[Bartleby]

MrMag, your rate of fire has nothing to do with the reactiveness of the trigger. it's solely based on the input pressure.

[MrMag]

actually it does. it will still have the bounce to it if u dont shoot that fast, but o actually make it "reactive" u have to be able to shoot it fast enough

[covadsucks]

Mr Mag, Bartleby has his beliefs and we all must respect them -even if you believe him to be wrong. I on the other hand can attest to the reactive trigger of the Miniretro Mag I sold to Tyson Machado. It'd hit the sweetspot and outshoot my Revvy in a quick minute.