Big,
your contention makes no logical sense; it was PTP that brought the suit, not BE. An Arbitration settlement means that both sides agreed to the terms - otherwise no settlement. Therefore, its logical to assume that PTP won.
You make even less sense with the follow-on statement about the validity of PTP IP, since in negotiating or litigating the same, PTP would be free to reveal the terms of their ORIGINAL CONTRACT with BE that covered the licensing agreement.
Their IP has already been given the validity you want to deny it. Too bad for you.
your contention makes no logical sense; it was PTP that brought the suit, not BE. An Arbitration settlement means that both sides agreed to the terms - otherwise no settlement. Therefore, its logical to assume that PTP won.
You make even less sense with the follow-on statement about the validity of PTP IP, since in negotiating or litigating the same, PTP would be free to reveal the terms of their ORIGINAL CONTRACT with BE that covered the licensing agreement.
Their IP has already been given the validity you want to deny it. Too bad for you.





I actually almost clicked on that link.
Good one Josh, good one.




Comment