So who has it?

[AzrealDarkmoonZ]

http://shootingsoftware.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=RSI&Category_Code=CED

And if I remember my email conversation with the guy who doing the hardware its good at at least 50 bps.

Az

[MANN]

I am going to give them a call this week. that looks interesting.

[Hilltop Customs]

on the note of what you were talking about earlier. there is a thread somewhere on AO where that Idea came up. There was an interesting conversation about it. I think that the end conclusion was that it would cost too much to become pratical.

TK posted something similar awhile back, Tom mentioned direct high input markers and, I think, a direct velocity control based off a gun mounted chrono. IDK if Tom ever went into any detail on how to make the onborad chrono possible....which is kindof where my thought started(based on a easliy adaptable and extremely portable testrig to find velocity data@ rof). Was it discussed more in depth somewhere else? I wonder why it would be so cost prohibitive, SP electronics patent?

[Miltonyz]

TK posted something similar awhile back, Tom mentioned direct high input markers and, I think, a direct velocity control based off a gun mounted chrono. IDK if Tom ever went into any detail on how to make the onborad chrono possible....which is kindof where my thought started(based on a easliy adaptable and extremely portable testrig to find velocity data@ rof). Was it discussed more in depth somewhere else? I wonder why it would be so cost prohibitive, SP electronics patent?

For the onboard chrono. Is it possible to use two different sets of breakbeam eyes and have the marker count the time between eye breakage. For example have the first set of eyes just past the bolt. The ball is fired crossing the beam and sending the signal. Six inches down the barrel another set of eyes is crossed and a new signal is set. The processor can then adjust the dwell of the marker based on its figures. Probably expensive and the code would probably be hard