I posted this on PBN< and felt like putting it over here as well. The backstory on this on PBN is simple. In response to observations that the paint is indeed only weighting in at 1.2 grams (as expected) the assertion has been made that there is a better formula on the way, we just have not been shown it.
Valid question.
We have come out with the weight of the ball being in the neighborhood of 1.2 to 1.3 grams. We do this in two methods: mathematical reduction of weight based on size, and actually weighing the balls currently available (in sealed GI MilSim bags). The graphs and ballistic calculations tell us that at 1.3 grams the ball will not perform as well as a 68 in terms of range at 300FPS. It may or may not have enough energy to break - we are assuming the shell will be redone.
The claims are that this is not the "final formula". We assume that means they are intending to make the final formula heavier, so as to give them similar performance in range to a 68.
Apparently this is not a simple task. Reading TKs input on it finding a suitable fill material to increase weight without being toxic and still being able to be mass produced has been a problem. Therefore we have to assume that there is some effort going into the R+D of this "final formula" fill.
Obviously if this much is being bet on that R+D there is some belief of those doing it it will be successful. Considering this was shown to the market as less than the "final formula" it can be assumed it is taking more effort than normal.
So the question becomes: Will this "final formula" be patented or otherwise protected in some way? If it is, why should we believe for a moment that it will be available cheaper than the product currently offered by several different companies?
Valid question.
We have come out with the weight of the ball being in the neighborhood of 1.2 to 1.3 grams. We do this in two methods: mathematical reduction of weight based on size, and actually weighing the balls currently available (in sealed GI MilSim bags). The graphs and ballistic calculations tell us that at 1.3 grams the ball will not perform as well as a 68 in terms of range at 300FPS. It may or may not have enough energy to break - we are assuming the shell will be redone.
The claims are that this is not the "final formula". We assume that means they are intending to make the final formula heavier, so as to give them similar performance in range to a 68.
Apparently this is not a simple task. Reading TKs input on it finding a suitable fill material to increase weight without being toxic and still being able to be mass produced has been a problem. Therefore we have to assume that there is some effort going into the R+D of this "final formula" fill.
Obviously if this much is being bet on that R+D there is some belief of those doing it it will be successful. Considering this was shown to the market as less than the "final formula" it can be assumed it is taking more effort than normal.
So the question becomes: Will this "final formula" be patented or otherwise protected in some way? If it is, why should we believe for a moment that it will be available cheaper than the product currently offered by several different companies?








Comment