Matrix vs. Excalibur/Viking

[i-luv-my-rt]

I would like to know if you guys have any experience with these markers. The Viking and the Excalibur are basically the same marker so either will be fine. Vikings arent totally out yet but some people have shot them. I am looking for a new back-up gun and would just like some help. Thanks Guys!!!!

[mykroft]

I've shot both. There is no comparison, the E-Matrix is far better. It's lighter, faster and cheaper. Out of all the electro's I've shot, the E-Matrix is my second favourite, after the Sonic Bushy, and that only because I like the Bushy's smaller size. The Excalibur is the most over priced and underperforming electro I've seen, out of the box it's slower than a Zap Electro, and looks and weighs about the same as a first-gen Shocker, this on a gun that costs as much as an IR3. If you want LP, go with a Matrix or a Shocker, if you want performance, go with a Matrix or an E-Mag, if you want a combination of the two, go with a Matrix or a Bushy, if you want to spend too much money, go with an Angel or an Excalibur.

[i-luv-my-rt]

Thanks man thats some good info. First person i have ever heard of that shot both and had an explanation. Thanks!!

[Tim Jacobitz]

i hav an excal and love it. I don't know where you got you info but the ematrix is heavyer than an excal. The matrix is also a gas hog.

Don't get me wrong though with a plamer on the matrix they do some serious rocking at a very low bolt pressure. I am thinking of buying one myself for a back up gun.

[Tim Jacobitz]

buy the way my excal has a bolt perssure of 60 psi out of the bock and will go lower with tweaking. I can shoot a case of paint form 1 tank of comperssed air. 68/4500. It shoots 13 bps outa the box. and can be adjusted faster. It is so low pressure you just don't break paint. The bolt stops on more balls than it breaks. It weights the same as an angel. It is almost the same body design. Not to be rude but you said it weights the same as a shocker, Have you ever really seen one. I am not tring to be rude I just think you have been miss informed. The only 2 draw backs of the gun are that it does not have some of the cool upgrades like other guns. like the ace, but it does not need it. The other draw back is they are very very expensive. If the price came down you would see alot more of them.

[Cliffio]

ive never shot either but i do know there is a HUGE price difference, so whatever you can afford
you can always make the matrix work great with the extra cash you saved from the excal

but the viking is like 800 or so

but like i said, i havent shot any of these

holla
Cliff

[PB700]

The viking is just a hi price spyder with a hyperframe

[Dodo]

i`ve shot a matrix before they rock i love them if you do get one get a trenty and a bolt kit and when you get em set up right you cant beat em hehe http://www.midsouthpaintball.com/for...?threadid=1190

[Gecko]

don't forget the 300 bucks worth of upgrades to make a matrix usable, easily putting it in the range of a viking. My friend has a matrix with a trinity and bolt kit, nice gun fast accurate. Last 10 man it went down and he used my excal......
Another 2 people at my field have stock matrixes without bolt kits and trinity's. These guns refuse to work, constantly bolt sticking with massive chops. As for the uniformed person comapring the excal size to a shocker.......

http://www.pbnation.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=50355

And worst of all matrixes are made in Canada shudder

Gecko

[Spaceman613]

Viking

The viking is NOT a high priced spyder with hyperframe. It is more along the lines of BM2k or impulse or angel. I would go for the viking. AKA cust service is great, and you will have amarker that you dont see everyday. I see tons of Matrices, some work great, others can barely get them to shoot.

[PB700]

spaceman the viking uses the AKALMP VLM spyder body Page 137 in APG January 2002

[Gecko]

that is old news
aka has revamped the viking to be a single solinoid open bolt marker along the lines of angels and impulses. I repeat the viking is no longer a super spider. Go to the aka forums in pbnation for more info.
Gecko

[steveg]

the 02 version of the matrix, whenever its released will
have those $300 worth of upgrades included, at hopefully
not much more than the present price.

The matrix is new, people are still learning. Ilove mine

[mykroft]

Umm, The Matrix is definitely lighter than the Excalibur, it's mostly open space inside, the Excalibur is mostly solid metal. And AKALMP was very upfront at the IAO about shipping the Excalibur set to 10bps, slower than even the Zap Crap gun. While the Excalibur has some serious tweaking potential, the Matrix is higher performance out of the box, and with some upgrades (The bolt kit and an LPR reg) it easily outperforms the Angel, juggling the trigger is insanely easy. I'm not that familiar with the Viking, but from what I've read, it's similar to the Intimitator, IE: a Bushy/Impy type gun built on a spyder body (The Timmy is pretty much a Bushy shoehorned into a heavily modified Millenium body). AKALMP really needs to do some work on the Excalibur in regards to out-of-box performance and price/performance ratio, it's biggest weakness is it's way overpriced.

[mac2k4]

the viking is a very good gun
the matrix is a very good gun
the excal is a very good gun

all of them are very good guns, and all of them except the excal are about 700. the excal runs about 1100.
the excal is closed bolt, the matrix is closed bolt, the viking is open bolt.
there in no difference from closed and open bolt.

the matrtix is kinda gas hog, the viking and excal is very efficiant, all of them are low pressure operating.
my opinion is that i'd get a viking, 45/4500 bottle, 14 in. JnJ barrell kit. rev. and ya are set for about 1g.
fairly cheap for all of that and very good shooting.