Efficiency mod?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hill160881
    fire power my friends

    • Jun 2008
    • 1156

    #1

    Efficiency mod?

    So i was tinkering around with putting an oring somewhere on the powertube to reduce bolt wear and maybe seal up a bit better when the bolt is forward. I did this by clamping the brass piece in a drill and held a fine tooth reciprocating saw blade to it as it turned.

    Normally i get around 1600 to 1700 rounds on a 88 ci 4500psi fill. After installing the moded brass power tube thingy i got 1500 on a 3500 psi fill with the same tank? It also had a big difference in sound. A side by side comparison left no doubt that it was quieter. I only need to do a chrono test to confirm my results.

    Any thoughts? Has this been tried before? Could the rate of fire affect the efficiency, meaning will shooting in full auto at 20+ bps cause it to get better efficiency.?

    Fire power my friends.
  • BigEvil
    www.BigEvilOnline.com

    • Feb 2005
    • 9333

    #2
    Nice.

    Comment

    • hill160881
      fire power my friends

      • Jun 2008
      • 1156

      #3
      This is after 5000 rounds. Notice how flat the o-ring is. I think a urethane o-ring would hold up better though.
      Fire power my friends.

      Comment

      • Smoothice
        Registered User

        • Nov 2006
        • 4579

        #4
        Interesting. Very interesting. Thats pretty cool.

        Comment

        • Sniper Steve
          Registered User
          • Dec 2007
          • 230

          #5
          I am impressed, I want to try this myself.

          Comment

          • M98Punk
            NYOG President
            • Nov 2002
            • 656

            #6
            How many balls have you put through this?!?!?

            This sounds like a worthy mod to do with my micropistol..... ya know after I finally get the spring feed fixed :-P
            Girls are no substatute of paintball

            Murphy's law of paintball: If it jams force it. If it breaks it needed replacing anyways

            Comment

            • Old School 626
              Old enough to know better.
              • Nov 2007
              • 368

              #7
              Thinking about this section of the marker and how things work I think you'd be better off sealing the valve to the body where there less a probability of tolerance issues.

              What you are doing is sealing off any wasted gas escaping back down the sides of the power tube. You could do the same thing with an over sized OD on the bumper such that the bumper seals against the side of the body. It'd likely be marginally less efficient if you believe that volume reduces efficiency but probably more reliable in the long run.

              Good on ya for trying something new!

              Comment

              • RogueFactor
                Registered User
                • Dec 2001
                • 633

                #8
                Originally posted by hill160881
                Any thoughts? Has this been tried before?
                It has, but not publicized. This was something I tinkered with back around late ~2006. I did it on both a L10 and L7 tip, here is a pic:

                Comment

                • Spider-TW
                  U R techno-literate!

                  • Oct 2006
                  • 3554

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Old School 626
                  Thinking about this section of the marker and how things work I think you'd be better off sealing the valve to the body where there less a probability of tolerance issues.

                  What you are doing is sealing off any wasted gas escaping back down the sides of the power tube. You could do the same thing with an over sized OD on the bumper such that the bumper seals against the side of the body. It'd likely be marginally less efficient if you believe that volume reduces efficiency but probably more reliable in the long run.

                  Good on ya for trying something new!
                  You would still loose the air through the sear slot.

                  Bolt leaks are indeed annoying.

                  Comment

                  • hill160881
                    fire power my friends

                    • Jun 2008
                    • 1156

                    #10
                    Thanks everyone and good ideas. I will try a chrono test this next weekend.

                    I warn anyone trying this mod to GO SLOW or go to far.
                    Fire power my friends.

                    Comment

                    • Spider-TW
                      U R techno-literate!

                      • Oct 2006
                      • 3554

                      #11
                      Originally posted by RogueFactor
                      It has, but not publicized. This was something I tinkered with back around late ~2006. I did it on both a L10 and L7 tip, here is a pic:

                      Any opinion?

                      Comment

                      • hill160881
                        fire power my friends

                        • Jun 2008
                        • 1156

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RogueFactor
                        It has, but not publicized. This was something I tinkered with back around late ~2006. I did it on both a L10 and L7 tip,
                        I totally guessed on the location of the oring. Did you get any test data?

                        This valve can be viewed ripping with this mod at 25 bps. Its the valve in the minigun mag.
                        Last edited by hill160881; 02-14-2011, 05:00 PM.
                        Fire power my friends.

                        Comment

                        • RogueFactor
                          Registered User
                          • Dec 2001
                          • 633

                          #13
                          Originally posted by hill160881
                          I totally guessed on the location of the oring. Did you get any test data?
                          I did, which is why the idea was shelved. The benefits were negligible. It did however lead me in new directions with my testing and prototyping, which was really the benefit of it all.


                          Originally posted by Spider-TW
                          Any opinion?
                          Its an interesting modification for the tinkering type, but by itself it was not something I found worth pursuing.

                          Comment

                          • hill160881
                            fire power my friends

                            • Jun 2008
                            • 1156

                            #14
                            So could the sustained high rate of fire be what is giving me better efficiency?

                            And what about putting the oring inside the bolt like a sail oring? Then it would maintain contact with the power tube the entire time.
                            Fire power my friends.

                            Comment

                            • pinkanese
                              Registered User
                              • Nov 2007
                              • 228

                              #15
                              Did you ever try putting a seal at the front of the breech or perhaps adding a ring to the bolt? Seems like doing this mod and sealing the front end of the bolt could have a larger impact.

                              Comment

                              Working...