Classic RT Aluminum ULE body/ ULE Rail Milling

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xmagterror
    Custom Automag parts

    • May 2006
    • 872

    #1

    Classic RT Aluminum ULE body/ ULE Rail Milling

    Im in the process of doing R&D on the classic RT to make it lighter, accept autococker barrels and Angel feednecks/detents.

    With a main focus on weight reduction i have made a prototype vert feed classic RT body out of aluminum and made it accept an x valve instead of doing an over the valve design that uses the stock stainless steel RT valve. I HAVE REDUCED THE WEIGHT OF THE GUN BY 1LB 1OZ SO FAR!!!!! The next phase of the R&D project is to develop ULE rail milling to reduce the weight even more.


    Is there more interest in doing a body that accepts the stock Classic RT valve? The downside is there is only a 7 ounce weight savings by doing this. The stock valve is heavy.....there are also allot of guns out there that are leaking because the bore in the rail that the banjo bolt goes through is worn out.

    Participate in the pole and let me know if you would be interested. I will do a run if we can get 15 units sold.
    50
    Alumnium classic RT body for X valve
    0%
    25
    Alumnium classic RT body for stock classic RT valve
    0%
    25
  • BigEvil
    www.BigEvilOnline.com

    • Feb 2005
    • 9333

    #2
    Make them both..



    You're killing my wallet btw.

    Comment

    • knownothingmags
      RKM 3D Designs

      • Apr 2010
      • 4810

      #3
      Originally posted by BigEvil
      Make them both..



      You're killing my wallet btw.
      who needs money anyways.
      logoRKM 3D Designs

      Comment

      • BigEvil
        www.BigEvilOnline.com

        • Feb 2005
        • 9333

        #4
        Originally posted by knownothingmags
        who needs money anyways.
        Apparently I do, if I ever plan on getting laid again. Hookers arent cheap these days.

        Comment

        • knownothingmags
          RKM 3D Designs

          • Apr 2010
          • 4810

          #5
          Originally posted by BigEvil
          Apparently I do, if I ever plan on getting laid again. Hookers arent cheap these days.
          mmmmhmm hookers.
          logoRKM 3D Designs

          Comment

          • oldironmudder
            Registered User
            • Sep 2009
            • 108

            #6
            Stock RT valve. If people want it sorter, charge an extra $5 to cut it off or let them do it.

            I do want one but the only thing I probably wont like is the feedneck area like on your MM bodies. I understand about the machining but I would pay more for smoother lines.

            Comment

            • RT Lover
              nothing special
              • Nov 2011
              • 789

              #7
              what is the cost?
              Feedback http://www.automags.org/forums/showt...lover+feedback

              Comment

              • TimmyJay
                I came to play...not talk
                • May 2007
                • 779

                #8
                I would like to see smoother lines and leave the area rounded at the bottom screw. Is there a reason this is cut out? I can't see one and seems like extra machining. I would think AGD did it for a reason on their ULE bodies?

                Comment

                • TwilightG
                  www.BigEvilOnline.com

                  • Mar 2007
                  • 1387

                  #9
                  I know that I'm probably in the minority, but I'm still voting for a 100% compatible ule body for the classic rt. TL barrel and valve.

                  There's A LOT of classic rt's out there which have not seen much love in upgrades due to its valve design. A ule body will be a significant upgrade while still retaining its unique and classic design.

                  Although, I do understand that it caters to a much smaller audience and may not bring the same numbers as the mm body.

                  Comment

                  • RST
                    paintballmuseum

                    • Jan 2012
                    • 166

                    #10
                    Originally posted by oldironmudder
                    Stock RT valve. If people want it sorter, charge an extra $5 to cut it off or let them do it.

                    I do want one but the only thing I probably wont like is the feedneck area like on your MM bodies. I understand about the machining but I would pay more for smoother lines.


                    Yep.
                    TOYYYT LIKE A TOYYYYYGER my feedback

                    Comment

                    • Ando
                      Magusmaximus
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 4144

                      #11
                      Is there enough meat on the body to make a screw on back for those that want to keep it original and use the original valves? Those that don't can unscrew the back and convert it for a X or lv 7 valve....
                      My Feedback

                      Comment

                      • BigEvil
                        www.BigEvilOnline.com

                        • Feb 2005
                        • 9333

                        #12
                        Originally posted by TwilightG
                        I know that I'm probably in the minority, but I'm still voting for a 100% compatible ule body for the classic rt. TL barrel and valve.

                        There's A LOT of classic rt's out there which have not seen much love in upgrades due to its valve design. A ule body will be a significant upgrade while still retaining its unique and classic design.

                        Although, I do understand that it caters to a much smaller audience and may not bring the same numbers as the mm body.

                        There are a lot of Classic RTs out there.

                        Comment

                        • Lohman446
                          Useful posts: 7
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 9315

                          #13
                          Originally posted by TwilightG
                          I know that I'm probably in the minority, but I'm still voting for a 100% compatible ule body for the classic rt. TL barrel and valve.

                          There's A LOT of classic rt's out there which have not seen much love in upgrades due to its valve design. A ule body will be a significant upgrade while still retaining its unique and classic design.

                          Although, I do understand that it caters to a much smaller audience and may not bring the same numbers as the mm body.
                          Hush.

                          Before you do this can you let me know so I can buy up all the neglected classic RTs out there? These are the "steal" of the current mag market.

                          I would like to see it work with the stock valve as well - and keep the air through rail thing.
                          "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

                          Comment

                          • splat15k
                            The Beast from the East

                            • Oct 2001
                            • 1227

                            #14
                            I voted for stock valve.

                            XMT, do you plan on making an entirely new ULE gas-thru rail or are you planning to mill existing rails?
                            My AO Feedback

                            Comment

                            • Xmagterror
                              Custom Automag parts

                              • May 2006
                              • 872

                              #15
                              Originally posted by RT Lover
                              what is the cost?
                              Not sure on the cost yet...It will be a little more expensive than the ULE minimag body i did....because the classic RT body is longer (more material and exponentially more machining time caused by long boring bars)

                              Comment

                              Working...