Re: A BIG Trigger Question!!!!!!
Okay, this is far down the list, but here's my 2 cents Tom.
The question may not be 'which marker would you outright buy' but what would you upgrade to.
You see, I (as well as many many many other people) have a mechanical marker because we cannot afford to outright buy a brand new marker. We buy a stock marker and upgrad as funds will allow. Now, I have a mech. trigger that is very short and chrisp, but if there was a way to make it shorter and lighter, I would be all over it.
Right now, the only way to do that is to buy a 300$ electro grip frame from centerflag. This is very very expensive, thus I will have to save for months. If you were to come out with an upgrade that reduces the pull by 2/3's (hypothetical, of coarse
), then I would DEFINATLY buy this. I would probably at that point not buy the electro frame due to such a short pull for about 1/3 of the price of the electro grip.
Now, to go out and buy a brand new marker, the answer will almostly certainly be 'electro' due to the current fad and to have the shortest possible trigger pull imaginable.
Now, if the question is "should I make the newest markers with electro grips or mech.", you should make them electro for those who can afford to buy those new markers. As an upgrade, the mech upgrade reducing the pull will be purchased by almost every single person who currently owns a marker with a mech trigger.
Hopefully that helps from a poor consumers point of view. Most of us don't have the 1500$ to just 'buy a new marker'.
Also, don't forget, as short a pull you could get with the cocker mech trigger, most players seemed to prefered to have an electro frame of some sort.
Originally posted by AGD
AO,
I have a hypothetical question for you. If there were two guns, each with identical performance and price. One is an electronic trigger that can adjust down to your typical soft pull. The other is a mechanical trigger but almost as light as the E trigger, kind of like an Emag with two magnets.
Which would you buy and why?
Thanks,
AGD
AO,
I have a hypothetical question for you. If there were two guns, each with identical performance and price. One is an electronic trigger that can adjust down to your typical soft pull. The other is a mechanical trigger but almost as light as the E trigger, kind of like an Emag with two magnets.
Which would you buy and why?
Thanks,
AGD
Okay, this is far down the list, but here's my 2 cents Tom.
The question may not be 'which marker would you outright buy' but what would you upgrade to.
You see, I (as well as many many many other people) have a mechanical marker because we cannot afford to outright buy a brand new marker. We buy a stock marker and upgrad as funds will allow. Now, I have a mech. trigger that is very short and chrisp, but if there was a way to make it shorter and lighter, I would be all over it.
Right now, the only way to do that is to buy a 300$ electro grip frame from centerflag. This is very very expensive, thus I will have to save for months. If you were to come out with an upgrade that reduces the pull by 2/3's (hypothetical, of coarse
), then I would DEFINATLY buy this. I would probably at that point not buy the electro frame due to such a short pull for about 1/3 of the price of the electro grip.Now, to go out and buy a brand new marker, the answer will almostly certainly be 'electro' due to the current fad and to have the shortest possible trigger pull imaginable.
Now, if the question is "should I make the newest markers with electro grips or mech.", you should make them electro for those who can afford to buy those new markers. As an upgrade, the mech upgrade reducing the pull will be purchased by almost every single person who currently owns a marker with a mech trigger.
Hopefully that helps from a poor consumers point of view. Most of us don't have the 1500$ to just 'buy a new marker'.
Also, don't forget, as short a pull you could get with the cocker mech trigger, most players seemed to prefered to have an electro frame of some sort.
Comment