Originally posted by cphilip
I know there are set points on the Morlock that we at this point cannot set on the Emag board. So I suspect that the answer is yes it can be made to shoot faster between balls. In fact I am certain of it. So any dwell can be adjusted with that board.
I know there are set points on the Morlock that we at this point cannot set on the Emag board. So I suspect that the answer is yes it can be made to shoot faster between balls. In fact I am certain of it. So any dwell can be adjusted with that board.
Hmmm... I just may have to pick up a Morlock board one of these days... Muhahahaha

Originally posted by cphilip
But some of the inherent set points on the Emag board are in the fixed software and designed to delay to make sure of sear lock up and such things as that. More programed for durability and security than they are for performance "on the edge" so to speak. Tom has always leaned to the safe and reliable side on all his designs. And that is true of the software end of it too. Tom has taken the road that he wants his guns to shoot reliably first and last long next. And let the other chips fall were they may on the others.
But some of the inherent set points on the Emag board are in the fixed software and designed to delay to make sure of sear lock up and such things as that. More programed for durability and security than they are for performance "on the edge" so to speak. Tom has always leaned to the safe and reliable side on all his designs. And that is true of the software end of it too. Tom has taken the road that he wants his guns to shoot reliably first and last long next. And let the other chips fall were they may on the others.
If the minimum delay time for a MAX ROF of 8 = only 125 ms, then why would there be any concern for reliability pragrammed into the board at this slow speed?
Since the EMAG is rated to handle at least 16-20 bps (minimum delay times of 62 ms and 50 ms respectively), surely there should not be any problems with sear lock-up at 125 ms...
Originally posted by Kaiser Bob
Jack if you try to get a rhythm of exactly 8cps instead of going all out, you will notice you will go faster because you arent getting the majority of your shots ignored by the board. I discovered this a long time ago when I had my first mag. Im expecting 3.0 covers this issue as well.
Jack if you try to get a rhythm of exactly 8cps instead of going all out, you will notice you will go faster because you arent getting the majority of your shots ignored by the board. I discovered this a long time ago when I had my first mag. Im expecting 3.0 covers this issue as well.

Ok.
I just recorded about a 1 minute sound clip of me pulling the trigger with the MAX ROF set to 8.
I varried the speed and cadence as you suggested.
I raked it fast, med and slow.
I walked it fast, med, and slow.
I pulled it fast, med and slow.
I registered approx. 400 shots including minor pauses for hand position changes.
When analyzing these 400 shots, I studied the minimum time interval between the peaks of the sound signature.
If the MAX ROF were truely set to 8 cps, then the minimum time interval should be 125 ms.
You would expect that after pulling 400 times with various rates, I should be able to find an interval somewhere close to 125, right?
Nope.
The smallest interval recorded in this test was 137 ms.
The MAJORITY of the "smallest" intervals recorded are 137 ms to 150 ms.
Since this same pattern of inconsistancy exists for ALL other MAX ROF settings at varried pulling speeds, I can confidently conclude that the problem is NOT whether I am pulling the trigger too fast or too slow.
Please, someone else do this same test so they can also verify, validate and substantiate my results and conclusions.





Comment