Cheater Boards (How to Stop Them)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Muzikman
    Everything AGD
    • Dec 2000
    • 6229

    #31
    Originally posted by RRfireblade


    Sorry,but it's NEVER going to happen that way.It's way to time consuming and to costly over all.Look at the chaos right before a big Tourny,everyone getting chrono'd last minute tweaks and confusion.Could you imaging unscrewing grip panels,swapping chips,software failures and debugging.And then what,either having to track down all the chips as they come off the field and getting them to the next group ,undamaged and intact.
    And if you don't install them just prior to going on the field,your back in the same boat of counterfit chips and altered software,cause you know someone will get out with one of the chips in their pocket and then your done.
    Not to mention,no more testing your gun before the game with any real reliability,cause you'll never now what the "official" software is going to do till it's to late.

    Just no way,never going to happen like that.

    Jay.

    Umm...the chips are yours to keep after the event. Do what you want with them. A PIC costs what, $5? The only thing I can see is the need for maybe windowed grips or something to make sure the person is using the designated chip.

    Again, there is no difference between this and what happens/happened at large R/C events.

    Comment

    • fallout11

      #32
      Re: Re: Just limit the ammo

      Originally posted by Muzikman


      Seeing as most of your events make their money off paint, there is no way this will happen.
      Maybe not economically advantageous, but it is do-able, even currently.
      I've seen it done on a small scale in the past.

      Something will eventually have to give, or the tourney circuit will continue it's sad ride on to self-destruction.
      It's well on it's way already.....

      Comment

      • Muzikman
        Everything AGD
        • Dec 2000
        • 6229

        #33
        All I am saying is that limiting paint is not the answer. Paint mfgs and event promoters would NEVER do it. Yes in small scale it would work, but when you tell a team that you are only allowed x number of balls on the field per team, you would be taking money right out of your pocket. Unless you made the limit so high, that it would have no affect on the problem you are trying to solve.

        If you are going this drastic, you might as well just get rid of electros and go all manual.

        Comment

        • RRfireblade

          • Jun 2002
          • 5103

          #34
          Originally posted by Muzikman



          Umm...the chips are yours to keep after the event. Do what you want with them. A PIC costs what, $5? The only thing I can see is the need for maybe windowed grips or something to make sure the person is using the designated chip.

          Again, there is no difference between this and what happens/happened at large R/C events.
          How does that correct cheaters?

          You don't think that once those chips are out someone won't just rewrite it or copy it's appearance,and then show up with that chip at the field?

          Jay.
          Logic Paintball Forums
          My A O Feedback Here
          Other Feedback Here
          If I've Been Any help
          Please Leave Some. :)

          Comment

          • SlartyBartFast
            The Flying Scotsman
            • Jun 2002
            • 2940

            #35
            Originally posted by RRfireblade
            Sorry, but it's NEVER going to happen that way.It's way to time consuming and to costly over all.
            Costly, not really. Programmers can be scratch built, with prior notice of what guns were going to be on the field, and the settings required/desired, the chips could be ready long before the tourney.
            Look at the chaos right before a big Tourny, everyone getting chrono'd last minute tweaks and confusion.Could you imaging unscrewing grip panels, swapping chips, software failures and debugging.And then what, either having to track down all the chips as they come off the field and getting them to the next group, undamaged and intact.
            And if you don't install them just prior to going on the field, your back in the same boat of counterfit chips and altered software, cause you know someone will get out with one of the chips in their pocket and then your done.
            Not to mention, no more testing your gun before the game with any real reliability, cause you'll never now what the "official" software is going to do till it's to late.
            Well, if the official software is based on the consumer software but not programmable, you can test it all you want before the game.
            If the official chips use a generic software, just buy a chip with the generic software for a few bucks to test the adjustable settings.

            Comment

            • SlartyBartFast
              The Flying Scotsman
              • Jun 2002
              • 2940

              #36
              Originally posted by RRfireblade
              How does that correct cheaters?

              You don't think that once those chips are out someone won't just rewrite it or copy it's appearance,and then show up with that chip at the field?
              You'd get a new chip every tournament. Each time a good chip was installed, a tamperproof seal would also be installed.

              Comment

              • Pacifist_Farmer
                Registered User
                • Aug 2003
                • 740

                #37
                and of course a Mech user steps up to solve the cheater board problem

                Before each turney a ref walks to each gun and passes a very large elctromagnet over it, if youre marker still works afterwards...

                play on!!

                Comment

                • RRfireblade

                  • Jun 2002
                  • 5103

                  #38
                  Originally posted by SlartyBartFast


                  You'd get a new chip every tournament. Each time a good chip was installed, a tamperproof seal would also be installed.
                  OK,OK I give up. .....But it's still not going to happen.

                  Whatever the arguement,I'll bet $1000 against anyone that it will never happen in our paintball lifetimes.

                  Not until we are so advanced technologically as a society that the capability to have ALL guns completely downloaded w/ thier software on the fly,through wireless transmission while your running on to the field using some Star Trek like programming device.

                  Jay.
                  Logic Paintball Forums
                  My A O Feedback Here
                  Other Feedback Here
                  If I've Been Any help
                  Please Leave Some. :)

                  Comment

                  • thei3ug
                    Canicus
                    • Oct 2000
                    • 846

                    #39
                    i've got one... each board must be flashed and physicall "sealed" by a manufacturer before the event begins.

                    booyah.
                    [*img]http://userpic.livejournal.com/11885469/469200[/img]
                    Filesize too large- Tato
                    Greatest "Sponsor" Ever.

                    Comment

                    • SlartyBartFast
                      The Flying Scotsman
                      • Jun 2002
                      • 2940

                      #40
                      Originally posted by thei3ug
                      i've got one... each board must be flashed and physicall "sealed" by a manufacturer before the event begins.
                      booyah.
                      But the manufacturers are also the sponsors of teams. At the introduction of electros SP made the Turbo mode work for their factory team during tournamants even when the tournament lock was on.

                      Comment

                      • rdb123
                        i have no ear
                        • Oct 2002
                        • 1507

                        #41
                        Originally posted by AGD
                        Formula one with their millions of dollars couldn't stop cheater software for race cars, I doubt we will be able to do better.

                        AGD
                        OT, but how would you cheat with a race car???
                        Pewter SFL E-Mag #EM01569
                        Pewter Shocktech Intimidator


                        My Trading Feedback

                        Extraordinary Traders:
                        Johnny Bravo

                        Good Traders:
                        fcpchop, Xerces, Piccolo, hawpunch, Boble86, NCpaintballer, Chupas2, shrapnel, gump1119, Methos, PunkOff, TheFlamingKoosh, RogueFactor, Jonesie

                        Comment

                        • SlartyBartFast
                          The Flying Scotsman
                          • Jun 2002
                          • 2940

                          #42
                          Originally posted by rdb123
                          OT, but how would you cheat with a race car???
                          Well, for example, in formula 1 you are nolonger allowed to have traction control. So they banned the use of wheel speed sensors.

                          However, it was rumoured that Shumi had engine control software that was implementing traction control based on engine rpm and acceleration.

                          When the allegations came to light, the Ferrari technician disappeared for a while and (surprise, surprise) Shumi started producing smoke with his rear tires. The technician came back when the storm passed, and (surprise, surprise) Shumi didn't seem to smoke the tires quite as much.

                          Comment

                          • Miscue
                            Super Moderator

                            • Oct 2000
                            • 7105

                            #43
                            There is no practical method to stop electronic cheating short of removing the circuit board. The ideas that have been proposed, are impractical and/or technically ineffective because they can be circumvented.

                            My best suggestion is a ROF cap at 13bps or so, I think this would solve a lot of things. But, this will never happen.

                            Comment

                            • SlartyBartFast
                              The Flying Scotsman
                              • Jun 2002
                              • 2940

                              #44
                              Given an effective test of one pull one shot, I think an ROF cap is pointless.

                              Need a computer operated solenoid/ram to fire the markers over the chrono.
                              Without paint you could fire a string of varying speeds and compare to the sound signature for number of shots fired.
                              With paint, you could fire a rapid burst to verify speeds in game situations.

                              Comment

                              • lord1234
                                College Boy Spydarm
                                • Apr 2003
                                • 1558

                                #45
                                cheater boards should be stopped. yes the "white board" with an undisclosed players name on it...
                                A Sanchez Machine Distributor
                                Ask me about my US Armed Forces, Law Enforcement and Fire Department Discount
                                PBN Feedback
                                AO feedback
                                EBAY feedback

                                Comment

                                Working...