Pneumatic Mags: A cure for the SP lawsuit problem and much more?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cledford
    Registered User
    • Feb 2001
    • 1386

    #31
    Originally posted by Jerhew
    i love mechanical wackiness so i do like the idea...
    but it kind of seems to be over-complicated
    And cobbling together a solenoid, board and a bunch of wires doesn't? I remember when the first Shocker (PVI) came out - I was shocked alright!

    What is normal today was over complicated a few years ago and in some ways this is actually moving backwards in complication - at least you don't need a pc, oscilloscope, or voltmeter to work on it.


    Would you say a pneumatic mag would be LESS reliable then an electronic?

    If no, what do we gain?

    No silly law suits but get same ROF.
    Lighter marker - no batteries
    Upgrade path
    Another win for innovation
    Cheaper (this is my guess) marker

    What do we loss?

    Some efficiency
    Some (could be small, cold be a lot) measure of simplicity and reliability

    IS it worth it? Let's talk about the wins and losses and decide. Throw up any more you can think of...

    -Calvin
    From a poster at PB Nation:

    ""Jim, back to your cave. Bob Long is on the batphone..."

    MY FEEDBACK

    Comment

    • nicad
      wannabe newbe
      • May 2002
      • 992

      #32
      typical shots lost due to energy consuption, assumeing 1530 shots off of a 68/4500 tank(200 CIPSI/shot gun setup): ~4 shots.
      For a mag, this total shots lost number is smaller, due to it being a gun that consumes more than 200CIPSI/shot.
      ColinMoritz

      Chord, Chord V2, Dallara, Karta, current project: (coming soon)

      Comment

      • cockermongol
        Registered User
        • Jul 2003
        • 227

        #33
        Originally posted by gtrsi

        I just dont see it being all that better than the current mag. I have shot tons of cockers and have yet to be all that impressed.
        There would be a major difference in this case. Though I only have limited knowledge of this mod, it appears to me the only thing you would be actuating with the trigger is a 3-way, which is lighter than any mechanical trigger. In the case of autocockers, the problem is you are not JUST actuating a 3-way, you are also dropping a sear that has a considerable ammount of pressure applied to it by the hammer. If you don't believe me, unscrew the cocking rod on any cocker and shoot it. I can easily walk my hinge/bomb 3-way combo without the cocking rod in, and, from what I understand, this is exactly how this trigger would feel. Since the ram would act as the rod compressing the on/off (I think that's how it works), the trigger would only have to actuate the 3-way, meaning a frictionless trigger. You could choose the spring weight to your liking, and get the trigger length to near-nothing with a 2 oz trigger pull. SOUNDS GOOD TO ME!

        Comment

        • Crimson_Turkey
          Magister Mundi sum
          • Nov 2002
          • 482

          #34
          Im in the process of releasing a new gun that uses a similar system, just with a much shorter and lighter trigger pull than any 3-way. It can be adjusted down to .4mm and a 1.5 oz pull.
          Originally posted by AGD
          What are some joys and struggles of your career?
          The joys are when you make it work well.
          The struggles are when they want it to be a different color

          AGD



          http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thefifthmarker/

          Comment

          • Jack & Coke
            TUNAMAX No. 1
            • Jul 2002
            • 2644

            #35
            How much pressure is required to trip the sear and close the on/off?

            Comment

            Working...