Re: Bonus Ball Question...Somethin to think about
This part is great
I know theres at least 5 more coming so it dont bother me unless you follow me , then I will say something.
Paint that breaks and clothes that dont catch, that would be PaintBall.
Classic
Originally posted by acropilot19
Heres a question for you AO'ers that occurred to me while reading the DMW thread...
I play paintball for fun, I wanna have fun & I want the people I play with (wether I know em or not) to have fun to. I'm out there for a good time.
Call me intuitive but one thing I've noticed is that when people are mad they usually aint havin a good time.
For the record I wanna say I consider myself a Very even-tempered guy, calm under pressure, laid-back, etc...
Now, with all these advances in ROF & the understandable trend towards Soft, Baggy, Billowing clothing to "catch" or bounce paint, I've come apon a problem...
Ive encountered the situation a buncha times where a "target" pops out (usually one or both of us is moving), we exchange paint (usually lots), one or both gets lit, They(not me) get MAD.
Personal experience has shown that now more than ever the paint is just as likely to bounce as it is break. Plus, the natural tendency when you have a "Machine-Gun" in your hands is to use it.
So I ask: WHY, if
-The gun wants to shoot,
-the Paint wants to Bounce &
-The Clothes want to "Catch"
are people gettin so pissed off when the actually have 5 or 6 balls thump 'em in the chest?
If I KNEW that ONE ball I just threw at you WOULD break if I hit you square, I would'nt bother sending five more.
I dont enjoy gettin lit, but I wear that same kinda baggy outfit for the sole purpose of bouncin your well-placed shot(s), so I understand the "why" of it.
I just think its funny the same people that pay big bucks for higher ROF & baggy paint bouncin clothes get PO'ed when they get lit OUT OF NECESSITY.
Comments?
Heres a question for you AO'ers that occurred to me while reading the DMW thread...
I play paintball for fun, I wanna have fun & I want the people I play with (wether I know em or not) to have fun to. I'm out there for a good time.
Call me intuitive but one thing I've noticed is that when people are mad they usually aint havin a good time.
For the record I wanna say I consider myself a Very even-tempered guy, calm under pressure, laid-back, etc...
Now, with all these advances in ROF & the understandable trend towards Soft, Baggy, Billowing clothing to "catch" or bounce paint, I've come apon a problem...
Ive encountered the situation a buncha times where a "target" pops out (usually one or both of us is moving), we exchange paint (usually lots), one or both gets lit, They(not me) get MAD.
Personal experience has shown that now more than ever the paint is just as likely to bounce as it is break. Plus, the natural tendency when you have a "Machine-Gun" in your hands is to use it.
So I ask: WHY, if
-The gun wants to shoot,
-the Paint wants to Bounce &
-The Clothes want to "Catch"
are people gettin so pissed off when the actually have 5 or 6 balls thump 'em in the chest?
If I KNEW that ONE ball I just threw at you WOULD break if I hit you square, I would'nt bother sending five more.
I dont enjoy gettin lit, but I wear that same kinda baggy outfit for the sole purpose of bouncin your well-placed shot(s), so I understand the "why" of it.
I just think its funny the same people that pay big bucks for higher ROF & baggy paint bouncin clothes get PO'ed when they get lit OUT OF NECESSITY.
Comments?
This part is great
So I ask: WHY, if
-The gun wants to shoot,
-the Paint wants to Bounce &
-The Clothes want to "Catch"
are people gettin so pissed off when the actually have 5 or 6 balls thump 'em in the chest?
-The gun wants to shoot,
-the Paint wants to Bounce &
-The Clothes want to "Catch"
are people gettin so pissed off when the actually have 5 or 6 balls thump 'em in the chest?
I know theres at least 5 more coming so it dont bother me unless you follow me , then I will say something.
Paint that breaks and clothes that dont catch, that would be PaintBall.
The marker needs to replaced with one that the user can safely control.







Comment