Originally posted by Ityl
Thirdly, this barrel design could just make a ball exit the barrel in a more consistent fashion, therefore increasing accuracy (well technically precision).
Thirdly, this barrel design could just make a ball exit the barrel in a more consistent fashion, therefore increasing accuracy (well technically precision).
I definately agree...
This is a question where it is not really applicable to quote high school physics eventhough it sounds cool.
The truth is we dont know. Palmers explaination is based on an assumption of paintball deformation which the photographs and docs test show is highly unlikely.
There are multitubes of explainations that could be attributed to the end result. Palmer sees the end result which is great... It works...
What if the eliptical bore effectively arrests spin in inconsistent paintballs....
What if the eliptical bore does somthing to effect consistency?
Any one of those could be a suitable explaination...
Our purpose here is to try to find out WHY it works.
The end DOES NOT always justify the means... just as the end result does not always justify the explaination.
Palmers barrels may work but the evidence shown proves to a good extent that his explaination is unlikely.


Comment