AO: We are back from the dead... again! After an 18 day outage, we are finally alive and well. Who knew how complicated updating software/databases from 2008 would be. I still have alot of tweaks to make, but my main goal was getting everything patched and updated to 2026.
Vbulletin 6 has changed alot since 2008 so we will have a ton of new features to dig into.
So which board is better? the Predator 2, Morlock, or the MiniMorlock?
I think the MiniMorlock and Predator 2 are almost identical, so I would say they are tied. Of course the MiniMorlock is made to fit anything and the Pred 2 is designed more for single solenoid guns(at least that's what I hear). The Morlock is just an older, bigger version of the MiniMorlock.
has anyone tried a MiniMorlock board with a emag/ xmag? if so how did it workout for you?
It should work just as good as the Predator 2 board in the DevilMag does, as long as it is programmed correctly. If I understand correctly, the MiniMorlock and the Predator 2 board are both made by the same company. If that's the case, then you could understand why they would perform so similar.
So..... let me get this straight, both boards are basicly alike? the only real reason for making the MiniMorlock is because of its size? but the program of the boards are the same?
The Predator II is made by TAG Sportz, the Morlock series is made by KM2.
I'm almost 100% sure that the Predator 2 is made by KM2 for TAG Sportz.
Originally posted by Chris Nearchos
So..... let me get this straight, both boards are basicly alike? the only real reason for making the MiniMorlock is because of its size? but the program of the boards are the same?
The MiniMorlock and the Preadtor 2 are the same size. The MiniMorlock must be completely programmed to work on a gun, it's specifically made to put in any gun, so it needs more programming than most to work. Also, the MiniMorlock can work with both types of ACE, not sure about the Predator 2.
. . . . . . samples the trigger asynchronously which means fast fast fast. . . . .
This just means that it doesn't "sample" the trigger at all. In essence, its always listening for the switch to make contact (or break contact). If you link this voltage to a flag (high on, or low on, either one) in the software, when the switch breaks the circuit, the flag changes state, and the fire cycle is started. You'd need a good debounce circuit to make sure that you don't pick up a bunch of switch bounce though. Therein lies the "fast, fast, fast" .
If switching trigger sample rates (or styles) magically increases your ROF, you need to increase your debounce setting.
The old Morlocks worked like this too, someone's just invented a new buzz word to describe it (not that the way they check the switch is bad, mind you).
I personally think the Pred II is the best bang for the buck (for a single 'noid marker that is) out there right now.
I just find it amusing to see people comparing it to its nearly identical twin brother, and actually saying that one or the other is better. Basically, the only difference between the Pred II, and the Mini Morlock is the firmware on the ROM (and even that is (or will be) very similar in function).
As always, I could be totally full of crap though.
Comment