Agg Mag (mQ-Valve)

[Bonx0007]

rogue, stop bothering people with irrelevant questions. the mag is looking Sweet man! pretty much what i expected. cant wait til its out....hopefully soon...

btw nice shirt

--edit can u take "agg" out of the name ?

I was wondering the same thing rogue was and I am glad he asked. Anyway, the new design looks close to what a mag looks like. I suppose a video will show exactly how different they really are.

[OysterBoy]

Remember, reading is fun.

They used mag parts because they were readily available, instead of fabricating a new body right away. This is, as he posted (As I READ ), an Alpha Proto.

I'm full of mixed emotions. Its great, but, may prove to be competition for the hAir trigger; people like what they are used to, so its possible E-Cocker conversions (People, not guns) may run the other way...

[Dayspring]

The question is why? You don't need the big battery any more. And since we don't need the sear assembly, you don't need the plunger assembly. A hyperframe would do well enough.

Would you be able to use a e-mag trigger frame with that mq-valve?

Less.

[PBX Ronin 23]

At fist loom i was like SWEET! but after reading and stuff it said it doesnt use a mag valve and pretty much anything else that makes a mag a mag beside the body and rail. Its a sweet idea but its just not a mag.

You're right. I'm not even sure whether we should call it an "upgrade" or a "modification" (I'm open to any other suggestions). My thoughts are that it may be an impetus to many younger players out there to start off with a Mag because of this mechanical attributes and have an electronic option for them to look forward to in the future.

[PBX Ronin 23]

Would you be able to use a e-mag trigger frame with that mq-valve?

I'm sure it co9uld be configured to do so. It's just a matter of changing wiring connections.

But it's more intended for people going from a mech Mag to an electronic option.

[FragTek]

Thats awesome! It would be even more so if you could get the Eblades eyes to work witht he mag

It'd be uber AGG if you could rig up some breakbeams... The E-Blade eye is junk to the 10th power.

[PBX Ronin 23]

Don't worry, PBX will be coming out with a lot of pleasant surprises in the near future. I'm hopeful though that we can positively impact those who have helped us in the past with whatever it is that we do in the future.

[WenULiVeUdiE]

Don't worry, PBX will be coming out with a lot of pleasant surprises in the near future. I'm hopeful though that we can positively impact those who have helped us in the past with whatever it is that we do in the future.

The Village loves you. Is the Cp reg required for this? In the past, all secondary regs have just decreased flow, and were not good for the valve's operation. But now I see a CP reg, and I'm think another reg may be needed. Is this true? I know it's only the Alpha stage, so I dont think you know this all yet.

Oh yea, I'm guessing you would use your frame( or of similar design) that you use on your cockers?


Andrew

[penguinpunk555]

It is better then a mag...

[PBX Ronin 23]

The Village loves you. Is the Cp reg required for this? In the past, all secondary regs have just decreased flow, and were not good for the valve's operation. But now I see a CP reg, and I'm think another reg may be needed. Is this true? I know it's only the Alpha stage, so I dont think you know this all yet.

Oh yea, I'm guessing you would use your frame( or of similar design) that you use on your cockers?

Thanks for your very kind words Andrew. For this particular proto, the in-line was needed but variations of the mQ-Valves will have different air input requirements. We don't necessarily need an in-line reg. It all depends on which model........

We've obviously leaned towards the Timmy style trigger in our Cocker E-Kits because it gave the end users more ergonomic choices with the myriad of after-market Timmy triggers available. Plus it was the trigger of choice in our surveys.

It is better then a mag...

This depends on your perspective, I guess. But only time can tell.

[nicad]

Any word on efficiency ... IE- in^3*LB used per shot? Input pressure @ FPS (how deep into the tank can it go).

Thanks-
Colin

[PBX Ronin 23]

Any word on efficiency ... IE- in^3*LB used per shot? Input pressure @ FPS (how deep into the tank can it go).

Thanks-
Colin

I may not be the best person to respond to this query if you're looking for mathematical equations but I'll try my best.

At the current moment we're using a Level 7 bolt with a short (stock) spring. We recognized the fact that we can certainly go to a lighter bolt and spring combo and still get the requisite return speed to cycle the gun at high speeds.

We can control the dwell time to 0.25ms which would give us a great deal of tuneability to find the perfect spot.

I was trying to find a post made by mquinn96 in our PBX Cocker thread in PBN that goes to answer this same exact question on a more technical footing.

At the very least it should match or surpass the Level 7's efficiency numbers.

BTW, in a totally tangential direction, this valve would look awesome with one of your bodies. I certainly wouldn't mind putting one together for myself Colin.....(hint)

[Beemer]

rogue, stop bothering people with irrelevant questions.

Hopefully you were kidding. Dayspring suggested I post these questions.

Theres always Hope, but I didnt think he was. He cant spell irrelavant so he might not know
what it means.

Any way good relevant questions, now I dont have to ask some of them. Thanks for the answers to

[Lohman446]

Wonderful idea, mag or no. Face it, when looking for compact (read single tube) markers, theres not a whole lot out there. This is a great idea, would love to see the final variant

[PBX Ronin 23]

Everyone should feel free to ask any questions that's pertinent to the thread subject. We'll try to answer them as much as we can unless business and legal issues will preclude us from doing so.