I went for #2. I've been saying for a while now a good way to "stop" many cheaters is within magazines. Publicizing who cheats, what teams, and their sponsors. Making it sound like their sponsor is supporting them and supporting cheating. Public humiliation is quite effective.
Either way the problem really isn't that cheating's there, or that you can prove they did it. It's that the penalties aren't even close to as harsh as they should be. I don't know if people would wipe should a $5,000 fine be attached to each one.
Players can suck up a player being taken out of the game, but not many will want a financial hit to their pocket!
Okay............ logic behind this statement? I thought violating the rules was what cheating is?
Either way the problem really isn't that cheating's there, or that you can prove they did it. It's that the penalties aren't even close to as harsh as they should be. I don't know if people would wipe should a $5,000 fine be attached to each one.
Players can suck up a player being taken out of the game, but not many will want a financial hit to their pocket!
Originally posted by teufelhunden

. If I see someone cheat, I pull them aside and have a little chat. It may just be that I think they cheated yet I couldnt really see what was going on.
Would what I be doing vigilante justice. Sure... but in all reality if I can't stand to play with someone because of how they play I am either going to calmly talk to someone in charge about it or not play... its not my job to enforce the rules.



Comment