XMag Production

[SlartyBartFast]

Many marker have greatly improved. In there prospective lines they have all got better. The quality of the pro is lacking to the guns before it. It works, but it isn't the minimag, RT classic, or E/Xmag. The quality of these 4 markers was cuting edge. Yet they are gone. I don't think the Rtpro is going to keep AGD afloat. With quality a side because the pro is still better than a spider in quality. The spider will out sell the pro everytime cause it isn't pricey and it will shoot just as quick. When you consider that a pro goes for 400/450 and you can run down to Wal-Mart and pick up an electro 200 or less that shots as fast the choice is clear to the buyers.

What on Earth are you talking about?

What improvements have other markers gone through? A cocker is still just a cocker and some of those are more expensive than an RTPro...

What's wrong with the quality?!?! The only difference between the RTPro and the others you name is the use of the ULE body and cocker threaded barrels.

You're comparing a 200$ Walmart gun with a 400$ RTpro? Are you nuts?

Compare the RTPro to other 400$ guns.

[Jeffy-CanCon]

What on Earth are you talking about?

What improvements have other markers gone through? A cocker is still just a cocker and some of those are more expensive than an RTPro...

What's wrong with the quality?!?! The only difference between the RTPro and the others you name is the use of the ULE body and cocker threaded barrels.

You're comparing a 200$ Walmart gun with a 400$ RTpro? Are you nuts?

Compare the RTPro to other 400$ guns.

I'm not an expert, but the Autococker has gone through some noticeable changes since the mid-90's. Several important components have been replaced with smaller & lighter parts, vertical feed has become standard, and I believe that the internal bore size of the valve and air-chambers is increased.

The RT-Pro has had similar improvements in body-weight and feed arrangements, I think.

Edit: I'd still rather have an RT-Pro.